This year the Final of Portrait Artist of the Year and the Winner's
Programme have generated much more commentary than in any of the previous
series - around 90% of which was adverse.
|
The finalists with their portraits completed in the Final
|
This is why I'm splitting my comments into three separate posts.
-
Today - a review about the Final / Commision and the paintings
produced by the artists plusthe result
- Tomorrow, the Winner's Programme and the Commission
-
Tuesday - a review of the PAOTY series and approach taken, and why it
annoys very many viewers and whether it is really fit for purpose
in the context of good practice and the current regulation of
television.
(It was going to be two - but midway through writing this my "dock" jumped
from my Macbook to my iPad and refused to come back - which left me a bit
stuffed in terms of finishing this post - and it took nearly an hour to get
back!)
I'm not sure if this is the right way round - since much of what happened in
the Final is essentially down to how the series works. However I'm trying to
keep it simple - but that mean there'll be some repetition across the posts.
To make sense of what happened and why people felt as they did, you need to
follow the paintings that were made.
Change of Location and Judges
The Final was full of people who were there to watch the Final - and it was
the biggest audience I've seen at a Final and I've been to a few.
The Final moved from Battersea Arts Centre to
Riverside Studios - a television studio next to Hammsersmith Bridge. Apparently
the date also changed. Apparently because the date changed Kate Bryan was
unable to participate as a Judge as she had another commitment.
Instead Isabel Gibbon, the Deputy Director and Chief Curator,
Portraiture - National Galleries of Scotland - who commissioned the £10k
prize portrait of Lorraine Kelly substituted for her.
There was
no announcement about Kate's absence which was very weird.
I'm at a loss as to how on earth this happened if the bookings people at
both BAC and within Sky Arts are both competent and do their job properly.
The date of the Final (Tuesday 23rd April) was in the original
instructions for people wanting to enter the competition.
The Sitters and Set-up
The Terms and Conditions for this competition stated
The Producer may ask all of the Finalists to depict the same Portrait of
a Sitter at the Final Location, or each Finalist may be required to
depict different Sitters at the Final Location.
|
The set-up and sitters for the Final Portrait |
It said nothing about what actually happened i.e. this year the Final had
TWO actors as the sitters
- Andy Serkis (age 60 from Lord of the Rings) and Lorraine Ashbourne (age 63 - of Margaret Thatcher in the Crown and Bridgerton fame), although only Lorraine got to sit down! They love climbing mountains
and had a story about how women climbed mountains in the past - in long
skirts. Hence they were dressed in 19th century dress accompanied by ropes and
"stuff" for climbing. They looked incredibly drab!
(Whoever thought this set-up was a great idea needs to be taken aside for a very detailed talking to to as to all the reasons it wasn't. Yet again ).
They were told they had an extra hour - for painting an extra person!
(more comments later!)
It was evident from what the artists said on entering the studio and their
faces when two sitters walked in that
they had NOT been told in advance about the change of arrangement.
In practical terms, the artists had turned up with supports for doing a
portrait of one person and were now being asked to do two. That's just plain
unfair in my book. I could use more explicit terms.
Put simply, this is not acceptable in relation to good practice for people
participating in a television competition. Which I shall comment further on
tomorrow.
Was it likely to promote a good outcome? Good question - which again I'll
address in the post about the series - and what needs addressing.
The Artists
In order of their heat, they are
-
Paul Lee (Instagram) -
review of Episode 1 - a visual effects animator working for the feature film
industry who lives in Tunbridge Wells. He has a fine art degree
specialising in painting. He returned to oil painting in 2022 and has
exhibited with national art societies.
-
Brogan Bertie (Instagram) - review of Episode 3 - age 29, he lives in Margate. He has a BA (Hons) in Illustration
and Visual Media from London College of Communication and worked in
freelance illustration and animation until moving to Margate and training
in leatherwork with Cope Studio and beginning to paint. He started
painting in oils for the first time in the last year.
-
Jennifer Anderson
(Instagram) -
review of Episode 4 - age 49, a professional portrait painter who lives in Glasgow and
paints on metal. She has a 1st class honors degree in Fine Art (painting)
from Duncan of Jordanstone College of Art, Dundee and has exhibited widely
throughout the UK and internationally in New York, Singapore, Florida,
Zurich, and Toronto and received a number of awards. She's very
experienced at working on commission and has produced a number of portraits for Oxford Colleges and
other universities and was selected for the BP Portrait Prize back in 2009 (and 2001/04/05/19)
So basically a couple of middle aged artists with degrees in painting and a
much younger artist with a background in illustration who has only recently
taken up painting - and painting in oil.
The Portrait Paintings
There are two sets of paintings in the final
- the painting produced during the filming on Final Day and
-
another painting which they had been asked to produce after the
semi-finals.