Showing posts with label art forums. Show all posts
Showing posts with label art forums. Show all posts

Monday, June 17, 2019

F&W Media Bankruptcy Protection UPDATE re SALES of Artist Network, Wet Canvas & North Light Books

An update for those who have had, in the past, a connection with Wet Canvas.  
SALES of assets have taken place.

How much Artists Network sold for
- and the relative status of "Crafts" and "Art" should anybody be in any doubt

Summary

The Debtors continue to operate their businesses and manage their properties as debtors in possession pursuant to sections 1107 and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Debtors have filed a motion seeking joint administration of the Chapter 11 Cases pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure. 
  • On 7th June the CEO announced that the Books Division had been sold and that the Random House/Penguin bid had been selected as the winning bid and was due to be ratified in court last Monday (June 10th)
  • On 13th June, an auction was held in Wilmington and the Communities Division was sold in separate lots. 
  • On 17th June (today), documents were filed, which seem to me to say that the sales are approved subject to certain conditions. (but bear in mind I'm ignorant of USA bankruptcy law) 
It remains to be seen what will happen to the art books, art magazines and communities and forums relating to artists - and the royalties due to authors.

Below are more details about the sale of the two divisions - and how come my name ended up in the Court documents!

Wednesday, August 01, 2012

Poll Results: Is Facebook replacing Forums for Artists?

The July Making A Mark Poll reveals that around 75% of respondents have a Facebook Account but only a third of artists actively market their art on facebook.

At the beginning of the month I wrote two posts:

  • Artists on Facebook - The Scope and The Rules - this looked at why people are confused about Facebook and the different ways of operating on Facebook.  This post attracted a LOT of comments following publication.  A number of artists shared their experience of using Facebook for their art - and their confusion as to how best to straighten out the way they operate on Facebook

    • the first asked about how you use Facebook for marketing your art
    • the second asks about where you post in facebook
Below you can see charts of the results for the two polls.

Wednesday, September 08, 2010

Painting from photos

This post is about painting from photos including photos taken by other people.

Over on Making A Mark Reviews - you can find a review of a new Ning site called Paint My Photo which is designed to create a pool of reference photos for people who want one to create art - and a community of artists who paint from photos.

Paint my Photo - Robyn Lovelock's Photos of Tasmania
Should you paint from other people's photos?

Now as many of my readers will know, I'm a huge advocate of developing your observational skills and working from real life when developing your art, whether it's a sketch a drawing or a painting, whether it's a landscape, a still life or a portrait.

However that's not to say I don't use photos on occasion!  However I mostly use them in conjunction with sketches I've done plus these days I always (that's ALWAYS!) use my own photos.

I also know that working from other people's photos could cause a spot of bother if you then want to enter your work in an art competition which is supposed to be about wholly original artwork - which means it's not original - it's a derivative work if it is wholly or mainly based on somebody else's photos taken by a photographer who conceived the subject and chose the lighting, colours, composition and crop etc etc.

See Making a Mark: AWS gold medal controversy - the final word for the conclusion of one debacle relating to working from another's photos and claiming the art as the artist's own.

What I do know is that many amateur painters and leisure artists - as well as some professional painters - do prefer to work from photos - and working from photos is a fact of life across the art world whether or not some artists acknowledge that they do it or not.

The issue for me is whether artists are working from photos AFTER they have:
  • developed observational skills 
  • learned how to draw
  • developed a good understanding of what information is missing from a photo and how photos distort real life.
Otherwise it seems to me you can have people who think they are creating realistic art when the photo they're working from does not look like real life in the first place and they have no way of knowing that because they weren't there when it was taken.

That's quite apart from the questions of why would you create a painting which looks exactly like the photo you're working from - which is a whole other debate!

What I enjoy a lot are the challenges created by people like Karin Jurick (Different Strokes from Different Folks) and Bill Guffey (Virtual Paintout) which focus on everybody creating their own artwork from a digital image - whether that's a photograph or a view from Streetview.  Now that to me can have some very real value in terms of creating pictures which work and which do represent original style - albeit derived from somebody else's photo!

Three questions for YOU about painting from photos:
  • Can you create art from somebody else's photo and make it your own?  What do you think?
  • What would be your top tip to anybody wanting to use somebody else's reference photo to create a painting? 
  • Who's your favourite artist who paints from photos?
[UPDATE: Somebody emailed me after I posted this, in a VERY "J'accuse!" way and quoted my "always" sentence back to me and included evidence that I'd created art from other people's photographs in the past - and referenced the photo and art in question.  I think I was expected to quiver and shake!  For the record the image in question came from a community project I led in a forum over five years ago - see Who hasn't had a bad hair day? which was all about learning how to draw hair in a fun context - using copyright free photos from a reference library. I explained that I had used other people's photos in the past - and had found them useful for specific learning purposes (a point which has been made by a number of people in the comments to this blog)  Also that my shorthand statement about 'always' unpacked for people who don't know me well and used in a current context meant "I ALWAYS use my own photos when creating serious art that I can, if I wish, make available for sale."  Unpacked still further - and for the record - I've never at any time exhibited and never sold any artwork created using other people's photos.  I no longer use other people's photos unless joining in on a community challenge for fun. 

I also explained how I'd learned from observation about all the sorts of problems which can arise and just how dull and flat drawings copied from other people's photos can look - if used without the three pointers I've highlighted above. 

I also revised my statement above as follows "these days I always (that's ALWAYS!) use my own photos." to make matters clearer for those who don't know me or follow this blog on a regular basis.

Since "J'accuse" doesn't seem to be in any way satisfied with my answers, would very much like to continue to split hairs in a troll like way (there appear to be no shades of grey in her world!) and is doubtless rubbishing both this post and me to anybody who will listen to her I thought I'd provide this update on the blog - without naming names.  I've probably contravening my own normal blogging etiquette with this so I might take this comment down - on the basis you should always ignore a troll - or edit it.


I puzzled why this issue was quite so important to her - until I found the answer on her website.  Exactly the same photograph of an angora goat that I had used appears to have also been used by her to create art to enter an exhibition in which she appears to have won a prize. C'est la vie!]

Sunday, March 08, 2009

Wet Canvas changes its User Agreement

A wall of ophioscorodon
11" x 8" coloured pencils on Rising paper

copyright Katherine Tyrrell

Wet Canvas appears to have a new User Agreement - which is really odd since I didn't receive any notification of this when logging on recently - which has always previously happened when changes have been made to the User Agreement. It creates a record that a user is aware of the new agreement and has signed up to it.

Neither did I receive anything via email as has always happened previously when the WC User Agreement has been changed. In fact I subsequently discovered that I'd turned off the emails from Admin! Then I remembered that this was because I was so fed up with the constant marketing notifications from F&W (the owners of the site) about media which I had absolutely no interest in.

Changes in the user agreement

I visited the site for the first time in ages recently and first noticed a link on the front page under "Latest Site News/Announcements" which just goes to this thread Concerning the new terms of use - which starts rather baldly and completely fails to reference any previous communications. Like the original announcement of changes to the User Agreement.

Then I noticed that the very next day that it was announced in A Letter of Introduction (which is the only announcement at the top of each forum) that Matthew Swift the Lead Administrator who'd started the thread was very suddenly no longer with Wet Canvas. Curiouser and curiouser!

I finally found this thread Have you read the new User Agreement? (in the WC! Site Discussions Forum - a forum which is studiously ignored by most WC members). It highlights some of the concerns which have been expressed my members and the responses from WC staff and moderators.

It runs for 226 posts and 16 pages. I wonder how many WC members have read this?

For what it's worth WC backtracked and made changes to their changes - but I still don't like some of the things it says and I think there's very definite scope for improvement. At the end of the day, WC will find out whether or not they've done the right thing when members decide whether or not to vote with their feet.

Overall it struck me, yet again, that all forum owners need to be vigilant about the concerns of their members. Otherwise, just like Facebook, there is considerable scope to find out how badly managed change has the potential to create a PR disaster.

Some recommendations about changes to Forum User Agreements

This is an open note to the owners of Forums. If you want to change the the User Agreement here are some things you might want to consider:
  • put somebody in charge of the exercise who knows how to handle communications in a web 2.0 world. All your users will comment on your handling of changes to a User Agreement if you get it wrong or fail to communicate effectively! Those comments will follow you around for at least the next six month every time somebody googles the name of your site - so there's lots of incentives to handle the communications effectively.
  • signal what you intend to do before you do it. Unless absolutely essential that changes are made immediately, make sure people have an opportunity to comment before any change appears to be a fait accompli. You never know - they may identify some implications you had not thought of and it potentially avoids to need to backtrack on the changes made.
  • explain your intentions in plain English. That then allows people the scope to check out the legalese as to whether that's the way they interpret what it says - or whether they think is says something else. Which might then require another trip to the lawyers and and another set of fees for making changes to an agreement you'd already signed off.
  • always invest in a lawyer who knows how to write a user agreement in plain English. This is perfectly possible - if you like I can highlight sites which achieve the best practice standard ie user agreements in plain English.
  • suggest you are going to allow third parties access to personal details at your peril. Doesn't really require any further comment does it?
  • suggest that you are going to allow third parties to access images posted on the site and reuse them elsewhere at your peril (Wet Canvas and Imagekind both assumed this was OK with members without checking it out with subscribed members first). If you're dealing with copyright and reuse for commercial intent (ie marketing the site with a view to enhancing the the profits of the owners of the site) then in my opinion this something which should be NOT be covered by a user agreement or should be a section of the agreement which is clear and which people can opt out of.
  • separate out essential notifications about the user agreement and site admin from your marketing notifications - that way people like me can stay informed.
What I've now done is subscribe to the WC! Site Discussions Forum which means I can now have a weekly digest of any new posts about site admin matters. Others are who are very casual users of WC and/or members always bypass the home page might like to do likewise.

Monday, March 02, 2009

MAM Poll (March): How do you price your art?

Angora Goat
coloured pencil on Somerset Velvet

copyright Katherine Tyrrell

In the Making A Mark Poll for March I'd like to to look at how you price your art.

It's a perennial question asked by new artists and a question which should always be kept under review by more established artists. It's also a question which I know is concerning a lot of artists as they try to work out an appropriate response to the impact of the recession.


My intention is that I will:
  • provide a commentary on the poll results at or just after the end of the month
  • write some blog posts about
    • the role pricing plays in marketing
    • different approaches to pricing
    • pricing in a recession
  • produce a resources for artists information site about pricing art
For the time being I've tried to find the best "shortcut" way of describing various and different approaches in terms of poll options. These are explained below.

Whatever the market will bear

A market led approach to pricing which tries to find the price which ensures a piece will sell. This usually involves testing out different price points to find the one which maximise sales. The results will depend on the channels used to test prices.

Based on comparable art where I live

the artist studies prices displayed in local galleries and other places where art is sold and finds a comparable artist in terms of media and/or subject matter and relates prices to these. Success with this strategy depends on whether or not the baseline artist is selling work and how much a reputation earned over years has been factored into the price they charge.

Based on comparable art on the internet

the artist looks at what else is available on the internet and picks an artist or group of artists, notes the prices asked (or achieved at auction) and then adjusts accordingly. More astute artists search for information about the price asked which actually achieves a sale.

Cost plus (wage rate+materials cost+markup)

The artist determines an hourly rate for their work, adds in the cost of materials (and matting and framing if applicable) and then adds a flat rate or a percentage as a mark-up which covers marketing and other business expenses and/or a profit element.

Price per square inch/cm

The artist determines a standard price per square inch or centimetre and applies this to all artwork. A different standard price may be worked out for very small or very large pieces. This can lead to odd prices.

Specific prices for specific sizes

This is a variation of the price per square inch which adjusts (rounds) the price to a value which sounds more like a reasonable price. It avoids odd sounding prices.

No. of hours spent on the artwork

The price is determined by a calculated hourly rate based on the notion that materials costs are incidental and the crucial cost driver is the number of hours required to complete the work. It bears no relation whatsoever to whether or not the market will pay the price.

Percentage increase each year

This approach is often used by an emerging artist who wants to grow sales income over time. The emphasis is always on relating to prices charged in previous years rather than what the market will bear or is currently paying for comparable work or input costs.

Plucked from the air

this is the "it feels like a $500 painting to me" approach. There is no obvious rationale other than a gut feel and/or a wish to avoid doing research to check out the current state of the marketplace
____________________

The poll is now posted in the right hand column and closes on the 31st March 2009. You can see the results of previous polls in The Making A Mark Poll - Resources for Artists

If you would like to make a comment on pricing please do so.
  • Tell me which approach you prefer to use and why.
  • If you have a variation, please explain what this is and why you use it
  • If you're using a completely different approach please let me know what that is

Saturday, October 11, 2008

The New "American Artist" Online Community

American Artist this week formally unveiled its new online community for artists. This is a brand new social networking website for representational artists. You can find the new site at http://forums.myamericanartist.com and you can get to it by clicking the forums tab at top right of the American Artist website.

I was contacted and invited to join the new site this week. After a few days trying it out, this post introduces the new site, comments on its scope and functionality and considers how it will fit into the current context of other online communities for artists.

Today's Home Page for the new American Artist Online Community
We launched this web site to help artists pursue their passions and share that passion with other artists. This is a community for all representational artists working in all mediums—whether oil paint, sculpture, watercolor, pastel, colored pencil, graphite, printmaking, or charcoal. As artists spend time on the site, they'll see what an amazing resource it is.
American Artist Editor-in-Chief Steve Doherty.
The new site replaces their old forums following the acquisition of the titles "American Artist," "Drawing," "Watercolor," and "Workshop" by Interweave. These had to be left behind on the servers belonging to the previous owners but there is an intention to move all the old content over to the new site.

I became a member (you can find me in the people directory as 'makingamark') and have been test driving the facilities. It's fairly rudimentary at the moment in terms of both guidance and contributions but appears to be getting off the ground fairly fast. I certainly recognise quite a few names already! (Hello Val!) ;)

For the last 2-3 days I've been trying it out and during that time the number of members has been increasing very steadily - but activity on the site is taking a little longer to take off. I'm not entirely surprised as some of the facilities will feel very new to some people.

You'll find a summary of the features below followed by my comments on the facilities the site offers and my musings on where it might fit into the overall scheme of things.

I'm personally finding the site to be a sort of a cross between Wet Canvas, Facebook, Flickr and ning!
The facebook type features will probably "throw" traditional forum people and the tradtional forum set-up will feel very odd to the facebook people - but hopefully everybody can work it out in due course.

Forums

This section looks and operates pretty much like a normal bulletin board type of site with all the normal rules of engagement. At the present time it's very much in its infancy but I'm sure it will grow over time. This is where people who are used to web 1.0 structures will feel most at home.
However, the software is a bit different to anything used elsewhere and probably needs a bit more support to get people engaged. Demo threads - or links - in each forum showing people who to use the forums would be very useful.

At the moment the helpful threads are in the Community Help Forum - but are not showing up as links elsewhere - and I think they need to fix that fast. These are the two which I think need to be highlighted in all the Forums.
Blogging

I seem to recall suggesting to the chap who runs the bit of F&W Publications which owns Wet Canvas - in A new owner for Wet Canvas - that blogs were the way forward for the giant bulletin board sites if they want to fit in with the new web 2.0 world, but nothing has happened in the last 15 months. It now looks like the American Artist people got there first!

At present the only blogs which have been developed are being used by the American artist staff - Editor in Chief Stephen Doherty (Steve Doherty's Blog) and Brian Riley (The Gallery Blog), the senior editor for all the American Artist titles.

There's also a page where you can see all the blogs of members - so long as they've included them in their profiles. So far mine's the only one that's listed which makes me think it's either not the blogging community who've joined so far - or people haven't filled out their profiles (that's a lot of people) or they can't discover this page easily (that's me - it took me 3 days!). I was also wondering whether they intend to develop blogs for each of the magazine titles - as it was not immediately obvious from the home page for blogs that these already exist!

They have a neat bit of software which allows you to see the Most Recent, Most Viewed and Most Commented. Should be interesting!

Having a blog on a site supported by a major player in the American Art Community will make some people much more comfortable about blogging. However, in general, I wouldn't suggest people use sites like this for blogs if you want to have your own identity and control over what your blog looks, says and does as you can only really get this with your own site using webware and/or your own domain host. You also won't 'own' any hits to your site as these will only help the American Artist site and is one of the very obvious reasons from their perspective for having blogs on any site like this!

It's not clear what the criteria are for people to have a blog on the site - and you have to apply to join. However if you feel less confident having your own blog and/or would like to be blogging as part of a much bigger community - and I think that might be quite a few people - then a site like this might suit you very well - if newbies are permitted. What it needs now is for somebody to say 'who can blog' and/or show members what an 'ordinary' member blog might look like. If I created one all it's going to do is provide links to this blog!

Groups

You can develop groups pretty much in the same way as Facebook or Ning. Whoever creates the group gets to decide who can join and whether it is public or private and how it works. To post in a group you have to be a member. To post the the group blog I think you also have to be a member - and you can't comment either (or maybe that's determined by the group owner - it's not very clear)

It's been set up with two main categories for existing Art Associations (smart move!) and Member Groups. This is the bit which marks out this site as being distinctive from the existing online art communities outside the big and generic web 2.o sites such as Facebook or Flickr. It's interesting to note that after three days I'd say the bit which people have got to grips with most easily is the groups function.

Galleries and Videos

Each member can have an online portfolio and gallery - including a slideshow. I'm not commenting on either of these as I've still to test these out - but it looks promising. I don't think these can serve as substitutes for a website presence as my impression is that you need to be a member to see images. (I'm not sure because of the way I've got my security settings set to stop the automatic display of certain images).

People

The profile offered by the software is much better than on other forums. There's a lot of scope for customisation to make each page feel very individual - but that's not being exploited as yet. You can only see profiles if you join - and you can see mine here.

Where does the new site fit?

I started to wonder where this site might fit into the various art communities which already exist online.
The art world is a very large place. For those communing online there are different places which suit different people and I've written about this before in Art Forums - the ins and outs

Here are some of the bigger sites and more generic sites.
  • THE major player in the art forum world by a very long way (see Chart) is deviantART which has many more members with a much younger age profile. Many of the members are devoted to digital art, fantasy art and comics/manga - all of which have seen an absolutely explosive growth in recent years. It also includes a shop where members can sell their art.
  • Some people like the very traditional web 1.0 model as exemplified by places like Wet Canvas. F&W Publications own and run the site, and the administrators and moderators tell you what you can and cannot do. It typically tends to suit and support people who like buying instruction books and going to workshops and having people tell them what to do. Amongst its member there are a lot of hobby artists who tend to be middle aged or older. It does have members who are professional artists and/or young but they're not prevalent.
  • F&W Publications Artist Network site is the equivalent of what the old American Artist site used to be plus a few tweaks. It has articles and community forums plus links to videos created by the magazine staff, blogs for each magazine written by magazine staff. The forums are not very active and are presumably the reason why F&W bought Wet Canvas. Visits to the main site have taken off since it started to have blogs and videos on the site - but its communities continue to have low levels of activity.

Chart of the relative number of visitors for four different art networks/forums
Source: compete.com

Undoubtedly the new American Artist site has got some considerable scope to become one of the major players. It's got
  • a modern web 2.0 type structure which should help promote networking and attract those who want to move on from sites which only offer moderated forums
  • more scope for individuality which may also attract a younger audience used to the scope for initiating the sort of non-corporate groups and social networks enabled at Facebook and Flickr.
I think the big bonus of this site is the way it aims to link with existing art associations and allows members to start their own groups or blogs. It's a safe haven in a world where some of the other web 2.0 sites can feel a bit scary at times - especially if you're new to networking activities.

I'm not at all clear what sort of demographic the new site is aiming to serve - other than 'representational artists'. Does this mean contemporary artists working in an abstract or abstracted or conceptual way are not welcome? Does this mean younger people pursuing fantasy art won't find a home here? Is it only for people who like reading the sorts of magazine which the American artist set up produces? I think the site maybe needs to say a bit more about the sort of people who will feel at home on the site.

The need for help and support

There isn't really another site like this and I certainly haven't come across the software they're using before and consequently there are quite a lot of things which are confusing to me - and I'm very experienced in finding my way round a lot of different sites!

I think it's going to be particularly confusing because it would appear that the variables for how things work on some parts of the site can be determined by, for example, the group owners. However a lot of people are used to notions that the way it works on one part of the site is the way it works everywhere on the site.

So far, with a fairly quiet announcement, the site has been successful at attracting people. However only a small number are actively participating as yet - but we are talking the first few days and it'll be interesting to see what happens this weekend. It's well known that it's frequently the case that there are many more people content to observe than contribute, however they can only observe if there's content there to look at!

I think there would be much more activity if the site owners invest more time and effort in supporting the notion that people can be 'up and running' very fast - and then show them how to do this.
  • More effort needs to go into showing people how to use the site and providing really helpful FAQs pages for people to learn from.
  • The down to earth and friendly 'help' pages at some of the other generic web 2.0 sites have undoubtedly been extremely helpful in growing that site into an enormous archive of images with masses of image-related groups attached.
  • Formal help can't be expressed in threads, it must be part of structured and systematic approach to providing a FAQs service and helpdesk set up - which can then be linked to or commented on from any part of the site.
  • Language is all important - and they're getting there. You absolutely can't talk web 1.0 in a web 2.0 world and it needs to be very appropriate for the nature of social networking and the demographic groups it aims to target - whatever these are!
Personally I'd go for a step by step guide for newbies with sections covering absolutely every single part of the site. Plus a contents list which includes every section even if it's not written yet!

Overall Impression

At the moment I think the structure and software could be very helpful to creating an active online art community. It also has the big bonus of being backed by major publishers of existing art magazines.

I suspect it's going to attract people who want to move on from the traditional bulletin board but aren't quite ready or don't feel like they quite fit at Facebook. I rather suspect that could be a large number of people. My only concern would be about whether commercial considerations might make for tensions with artists who want to be creative and behave in a fairly independent way - as they can on places like Facebook and Ning. That remains to be seen.

My overall visual impression is that the site 'looks' extremely bland (grey blue would not have been my choice!) and is badly in need of a strong graphic identity and a colour design which supports artwork but marks it out as distinctive. Maybe they should run a competition to develop a logo?

I do hope the blandness isn't about the sort of art and artists they want to attract!

In conclusion:
  • The structure of the site and its backers means it offers a lot of scope to be an enduring and important part of the online art community scene.
  • In my view, this will only be realised if a lot of more support is given to new users in the form of support and instruction on how the site works. A prominent site map or index would also be very helpful - people explore when navigation is very helpful.
  • I predict that people used to forums will gravitate towards the forums and those who have experienced the web 2.0 world will make their presence felt very quickly in the groups and video areas - and that these latter areas over time will become the liveliest part of the site.
  • I predict that people who want to have their own identities as bloggers will probably continue to blog using blogging webware rather than this site. However the site might be a good place for people to try out blogging and see if they like it - if blogging by newbies is allowed.
  • The site blogs run by American Artist editors and staff are a very useful means of communicating with them but the blogs which relate to each Journal need to have a much higher profile - and some contributions!
  • Blogs for groups looks a great idea to start with - but then I wondered about what goes in a group discussion and what goes in a group blog - and I still haven't got an answer.
  • The scope to have a group site and associated blog for Art Associations is neat! A practical example of how this might work might create more engagement.
  • The graphic design needs to be strengthened. It's very inoffensive at one level but it could be more attractive for those who operate in a visual world.
Links:

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

Drawing Day is June 7th

Drawing Day on Saturday June 7th is officially launched today.

This brand new initiative aims to:
  • submit a million drawings to various social networking sites - in one day!
  • promote the different ways artists can use various social networking sites to display and/or promote their drawings.
In a world where computer-generated replaces handmade, people often take creativity and artistic skill for granted. Drawing Day hopes to change this perspective by reminding people of the joy of drawing, regardless of their artistic ability.
Drawing Day Press Release
The front end website for Drawing Day can be found at http://www.drawingday.org/ and is very slick.

However, as one might expect with any new initiative which is getting off the ground for the first time, there are a few gaps with the participating sites (see links and my comments below) and not everything is presenting as well as I'm sure it will be as it gets nearer to June 7th.

It's free and simple to get involved - although it might involve having an existing account or becoming a new member or joining a group in advance at one of the various participating sites.

I've detailed what you need to do on the day itself - this is how you can upload drawings to participating social networking sites which are:
  • Draw on Deviantart.com (the largest drawing forum in the world). You need to become a member first. Then on Drawing Day create drawings either in your favorite graphics software or draw on paper and scan and then upload to your DeviantArt account (choose the drawing category) with a description saying "Created for Drawing Day - www.drawingday.org"
  • Draw on RateMyDrawings.com - You need to join the community first. It is going to have a special Drawing day section - although it doesn't appear to be in place as yet. Use the online drawing tool to create drawings through your browser. Drawings will then be available for people to watch animated stroke-by-stroke. I'm just wondering how their website will cope on the day if everybody tries to use the webware at the same time.....
  • Draw on AmateurIllustrator.com. This art and illustration community is one of the new kids on the block in terms of number of members. I've not visited it before and to be honest although I note the instruction to "Make sure drawings are uploaded to the Drawing Day 08 Genre" I'm puzzled as to how to do this/find this. You can create drawings either in your favorite graphics software or draw on paper and scan
  • Draw on You Tube - Subscribe to the YouTube Channel and Join the Group. On Drawing Day, record videos of you drawing on paper or take video screen captures of you drawing on any graphic software such as Photoshop. Then upload your video to You Tube with the title and tags Drawing Day to appear in related videos of other Drawing Day videos. You can also Download the Drawing Day intro video or intro image to place at the start of your video to spread the word about Drawing Day
  • Draw on Facebook.com If you're a member of Facebook, you can either use the Grafitti application or upload drawings to your profile and Post photos of your digital or scanned drawings and/or Post videos of you drawing to the Facebook group. Even if you're not planning on drawing on Drawing Day, Join the Facebook group NOW! The more members it has, the more Drawing Day gets noticed by people on Facebook.
  • Draw on MySpace You need to have a MySpace account and then you can use the MySpace Grafitti application or upload drawings to your profile or your photo gallery.
  • Upload drawings to Flickr - Join the Flickr group On Drawing Day create drawings either in your favorite graphics software or draw on paper and scan. Then upload to your Flickr account with the words "Drawing Day" in the title of your drawings or create a Flickr photostream called Drawing Day and upload all your drawings to this stream. Finally, organize your drawing day photos and add them to the group.
I think I'm probably going to use the Flickr option - but you never know - you might see a video of me drawing on YouTube!

The success of Drawing Day will depend on artists spreading the word. The idea is that whether you’re a professional artist or you just enjoy scribbling, the biggest contribution could be making sure that all your friends know about Drawing Day.

Here are a few tools to help.
  • find out more on the Drawing Day website
  • spread the word and get buttons and banners to display on your website and blog. Check that you are happy with the code before downloading. I saved the image rather than using the code.
  • view the Drawing day video at You Tube (I have to confess despite waiting a long time this did not work for me - but you may well have a different experience)
I'm toying with idea of hosting a project for Drawing Day - and if I do, I'll let you know more later.

PS I've now got News about Drawing - as delivered by Google News - at the bottom of the right hand column. Do let me know if you notice this blog loading more slowly as a result of having the Google News Feed.

Friday, March 07, 2008

UKCPS have changed the exhibition rules....again

Umbrian Umbrella Pines
coloured pencils on Fabriano, 11" x 14"
copyright Katherine Tyrrell

We have a solution! I'd like to thank the Executive of the UKCPS for reviewing the various comments which have been made in the last 48 hours and coming up with a solution to the matters which were causing concern. See
This is it - as announced in the UKCPS Yahoo Group last night by Pat Heffer, the UKCPS Exhibition Director.
Dear All,
I am writing in my role as the UKCPS Exhibition Director. The past 48 hours have been fraught to say the least, but I feel that a lot of good has come out of the many discussions.

We have decided to amend the rules as follows:-
    Conditions
    The Society wishes to see work submitted that is essentially the original work of the submitting artist from concept through design to completion. The exhibition should show the compositional and drawing skills of the artists, as well as their ability to use colour from a pencil source. For this reason, submitted work must meet a number of conditions:

    1. The concept design and execution of the artwork should be that of the artist, who will be asked to assert this. The artist must have taken any photograph used in its entirety for the whole work, but reference materials which contribute to the final composition can be obtained from any source, copyright laws permitting. Work cannot be submitted which has been executed in any teaching situation. No parts of work may be copied from copyrighted or published materials, without permission from the copyright holder and no images may be submitted which have been produced by drawing over a digital reproduction. Any reference material can be sourced to build up a composition, but producing an identical copy of someone else's composition regardless of whether the artist has permission or not, is not acceptable.
These rules will not come into effect until 2009, giving all of our members a chance to comply.

We have considered all of your comments and feel that this is the way forward. I do hope you agree.

Tomorrow Bob and I will start writing to all of our members explaining our decisions and including a revised entry form for Bristol. Entries for Keswick can be made on the new form sending in anything you would have sent in last year, the deadline being too close for us to be able to send out new entry forms. Emails will be sent whenever possible to save on postage. Please bear with us as this is going to take a bit of time to do!

The last thing we want to do is to upset our members, after all the society exists for all of you. Please do not think that the exec has become remote and out of touch. We all work very hard to promote and encourage cp work and personally my greatest reward comes from contact with members.

I look forward to hearing your comments,

Thanking you all for your input,
Pat Heffer

UKCPS - announcement in UKCPS Yahoo Group (members only) - reproduced by kind permission of Pat Heffer
My personal opinion is that I think this is an excellent compromise in relation to the various concerns.

From my perspective this means that:
  • All members and those wishing to submit to the Annual International Open Exhibition have more than a year to get used to the new rules, so all work being prepared for the 2008 exhibition under the old rules will continue to be eligible.
  • Artists will be recognised as autonomous individuals who make their own choices in relation to the comments of their peers. (The concerns about posting WIPs and getting peer comments and suggestions in online forums are effectively eliminated)
  • Teachers, on or off line, won't find work produced as a direct result of their teaching turning up in the UKCPS exhibitions. However, I still think teachers in any teaching situation, outside their own workshops, will need to be careful to get permission before supplying very detailed advice and instruction (eg online in forums) to avoid compromising the eligibility of any work for exhibition.
  • work which is a direct copy of a photograph by somebody else is clearly NOT acceptable. I'm interpreting the above to mean that the notion of copyrightable derivative works applies ie that any new work derived from a copyright source must be sufficiently different so that it can exist in its own right as a copyrightable work. This will mean two works using any photo from copyright free sources must NOT look the same as the photo or each other.
  • Some coloured pencil artists are going to need to develop their skills around design and sourcing reference material.
    • I know this is a particular concern of those who enjoy drawing animals and wildlife. I'm pleased to announce that Gayle Mason (Fur in the Paint) - who has a degree in zoology and exhibits at the National Exhibition of Wildlife Art - is now planning a series of blog posts about how to get good reference resources for wild animals which comply with the new rules - and posted the first one today Obtaining Wildlife Reference Photographs for Artists: Part 1
    • I'd expect Talking Point - the UKCPS newsletter - and the UKCPS blog - to be used to highlight resources for any members wanting educational support around the concept and design areas of artwork as well as more technical matters pertaining to the use of coloured pencils.
  • Everybody can relax - except for Pat and Bob! Good luck with the communications - isn't e-mail wonderful?!
I'm hoping that we can see a whole new approach from UKCPS to supporting its members in relation to 'professional practices'. It's great in one respect that the membership is open to all but it can cause problems which the revised rules are trying to address.

I think the Society now needs to recognise that it must accept a duty to educate and place more emphasis on supporting members who lack knowledge or experience in standards expected in relation to submitting work for exhibitions. I'm quite sure that the 'mistakes' which have been made in the past have been made through ignorance rather than any attempt to deceive.

I'm more than happy to support any initiative in this respect and will continue to place an emphasis on this blog and my website and my other information sites on sharing information so that we can all continue to learn.

Finally, it's a brave and honourable Executive which is prepared to acknowledge when it has got it wrong, seek views and then revise what it has decided. I'm very proud that - although we had a few civilised tussles along the way - everything has been resolved in a satisfactory manner.

I'd particularly like to thank the UKCPS Chair - Peter Weatherill, Founder and Webmaster - Bob Ebdon and the Exhibitions Director - Pat Heffer for all the work they done over the last 48 hours - and all the work they now need to do to get revised instructions out to the huge number of members that the Society now has.

For any UKCPS members reading this, can I commend to you the UKCPS Yahoo Group as a way of staying in touch and asking questions of the Executive. It has been invaluable in the last 48 hours.

[Update: This is the post on the UKCPS News blog -Revisions to Rules for UKCPS Exhibitions. This summarises how forms and communications will work in the remainder of 2008.]

[Update 8th March 2008: The application form - which contains the rules and conditions now applicable for 2008 - and which must be used for the Annual Open International Exhibition 2008 is now available on the UKCPS website]

NOTE:
Umbrian Umbrella Pines - the coloured pencil drawing at the top - is a work I developed at home after sketching this view one hot September afternoon in Tuscany - just across the border from Umbria. The photographs were a huge disappointment and, while providing sound information about placement, proportion and perspective, they totally lacked the correct colours - I was really glad I had my colour study sketches to work from in developing this piece - in which I pushed the colours still further!

Sunday, December 23, 2007

Blogging Art in 2007 - A Review (Part 2)

The Bigger Picture
describing where blogging art sits in a web 2.0 world

copyright Katherine Tyrrell - contact me for permission to reproduce

This is Part 2 of my review of blogging art in 2007. Part 1 focused on some blogging basics for art and illustrated blogs. In part 2 I'm looking at the wider context for blogging and blogging art , communities of interest in a web 2.0 world and the sphere of influence for art and illustrated blogs.

Above you can see what I’m calling “The Bigger Picture”. This is my initial effort at trying to describe what is happening to art, artists and the art economy within the context of a web 2.0 world. (Ask me if you want to reproduce this). I suggest you right click on the chart and open in a new tab or window if you want to see a much larger version and/or have it open while you read this post.

I thought it might be fun to see if we can produce a more refined version through comments and suggestions via this blog post.

OK – now I know a picture is worth a 1,000 words – but just in case you don’t get it let me try and explain!

The chart locates different types of people, from hobby artists to serious geeks to artists who sell for millions in their own life time (all notated in black) against various online activities (all notated in blue). The activities range between the static website and the web 1.0 type of regulated/moderated site to various web 2.0 applications which increasingly enable independence and instant communication.

In my model, this locates
  • artist websites and the more traditional moderated artist forums in the bottom left hand corner and using Twitter to communicate what you are doing minute to minute at the Venice Biennale or Art Basel at the top right.
  • Bottom left is the hobby artist without a computer. Once such artists get a computer they may also decide to get a website and/or join an art forum. More recently, artists new to the Internet are moving straight into blogging or joining a social community such as Facebook or Flickr. Many refer to their blog as their 'website'.
  • Bottom right are web 2.0 applications which are very popular with geeks who used to work for Microsoft (e.g. Linked In) – but don’t seem to have found many fans among artists.
  • Top left are artists who don’t own a computer and who sell for millions in their own lifetime!
  • Moving towards the top right are the ‘switched on’ galleries which have an IT/internet strategy which meshes completely with their marketing strategy for selling expensive art. Their galleries are online with private password protected sites, which only selected and approved clients can enter, where excellent images of artwork can be viewed prior to upcoming sales.
  • Sitting in the middle is the artist who can cope with computers and embraces what technology can do in relation to social communication with other artists and selling art online either independently or via an online gallery.
    • Within this middle zone the more traditional e-bay artist is bottom left....
    • ....and the Duane Keisers of this world are top right – initiating blogs linked to e-bay, subscription delivery of art to your inbox, podcasts of painting in the studio etc.
This is very far from a complete picture. Perhaps the most important thing to note is that there are obviously a number of overlaps between different activities and areas of interest. I’m hoping to find a way of representing these in a more refined version.

The broader context for blogging

Use of the internet and access to Broadband is continuing to expand.
According to OFCOM, Broadband take-up continues to increase in the UK with over half of all households connected at the end of 2006, putting the UK slightly ahead of the US for the first time.
In the UK and the US, women use the internet more often than men. In the US, 52 per cent of internet users are women and in the UK the internet is used equally by men and women except in the18-34 age group where women spend more time online than men (57 per cent compared with 43 per cent).
OFCOM
Accessing the internet from a mobile phone is also growing in popularity with usage other than for phone calls varying by country.

The number of blogs continue to grow
In a few short years, weblogs have come to represent the fundamental connected conversation of our pubic lives. The numbers involved have become very large: at Technorati we index over 65,000 blog posts an hour along with 2,800 fresh links a minute. Worldwide, we index over 100 million blogs.
Technorati Blog (December 4, 2007)
Blogs are now very popular in the USA.
Research shows that more than 12 million American adults currently maintain a blog, while more than 57 million read blogs.
Blogworld
2007 saw the world’s first, industry-wide blogging tradeshow last month in Las Vegas attended by thousands of bloggers and the corporations which are involved in the web 2.0 world.

The language of blogging
But not all blogs or blog posts are in English. In fact the majority are in Japanese/Chinese however the audiences for posts in these languages is very localised. David Sifry (forner CEO of technorati - who doesn't seem to have done a State of the Blogosphere post in 2007) indicated in October 2006 that the globalization of the blogosphere continues. Technorati data showed at that time that both English and Spanish languages are a more universal blog language than the other two most dominant language, Japanese and Chinese, which seem to be more regionally localized.

Too many sites / too much information
With sites expanding exponentially, finding a particular blog (like yours or mine) or a post (like this one) becomes very difficult.

I referred to the issues around indexing, directories and search in Part 1. There are mechanisms around, such as feedreaders, that are very good at serving up the latest post – but such posts are not necessarily the one that speaks with the most authority on a subject which you want to find out about or the one that has the most relevance to whatever you are interested in.

There are services like Technorati that try to attribute authority to different blogs – but I’m quite sure that this can be improved upon if for no other reason than the fact that at one point in 2007 my blog authority managed to go down at the same time as my subscribers, unique visitors and page views went up!

The environment for blogging in a web 2.0 world

In 2007, blogging is no longer the latest thing - by a very long way. The Techie geek bloggers are all beginning to move on to other modes of communication such Twitter, Pownce and Jaiku.

However, this is all happening at the same time as those who are slower to adopt new technology and are essentially non-technical are still getting to grips with their new home computer. A proportion of those who have got connected to broadband and learned how to access the internet might be thinking about investigating blogs.

It needs to be emphasised that for a lot of people blogging is still something new and something which needs exploring.

Is blogging over?
Some of the individuals in the bottom right hand corner of my chart – where the serious ‘geeks’ are located - are already questioning whether we've reached the end of blogging and suggesting it's now on the wane as people transfer their allegiance to social community sites like MySpace and Facebook.

However, blogging cannot be ‘over’ while there are still so many people who have yet to join in. In August this year, 'the man who does the cartoons' Hugh McLeod (Gaping Void) had two interesting posts which tackling blogging as an activity within a wider web 2.0 environment for communication. See
Blogging isn't for everybody. Web 2.0 is for everybody. Keeping a half-decent blog going is very time-consuming work. So of course there was a market for more time-friendly Web 2.0 apps, like Facebook and Twitter. That doesn't mean blogs will go away. It just means more opportunities for people to create and use new tools. The web stands still for nobody etc.
Hugh McLeod, Gaping Void - Why We’re All Blogging Less
In 2004, voters visiting the Merrian Webster website voted ‘blog’ as the Word of the Year. In 2007, on the same site, ‘Facebook’ came second in the competition for Word of the Year 2007.
UK adults spend more time on social networking sites than their European neighbours, with 4 in 10 UK adults saying that they regularly visit the sites. The UK adults who visit the sites spend an average of 5.3 hours each month on them and return to them an average 23 times in the month.
OFCOM
The use of social communities is increasing exponentially. Which particular social community holds sway in your country seems to vary depending on where you live.

Facebook seems to rule at the moment. From a standing start in 2004, (the year 'blog' was word of the year according to Merriam Webster) it's grown and grown and is now expected to have over 60 million members by the end of 2007.

Some of the innovations (eg Twitter) has had me smiling quite a few times in relation to people's attempts to find a new way of saying 'same old same old' in the side column of their blogs. I just don't 'get it' though in relation to how technology like this helps people who tend to relate to creative visual images.

Blogging Art in a web 2.0 world

Channels of communication
Last year, within the context of the general art world, I commented on blogs versus websites as ways of channelling information about artists and their work. I concluded that both are useful but that the blog was the only one to provide the 'virtual' experience of meeting the artist.

I'm now of the view that it's good to explore all the different channels that the Internet has to offer and to decide on a level of activity in different arenas which is appropriate to the time you have available - as there is no doubt that participation can swallow your time as I know only too well!

I've now got one website, two blogs, 18 squidoo lens, accounts on Flickr and Facebook, am a member of 4 groups dedicated to specific art interest on Google/Yahoo and periodically observe and occasionally participate in activities on more traditional artist forums. Phew!!! I don't yet Twitter - although some may disagree! ;) Within all of that this blog is undoubtedly the core activity in terms of both discussing art and posting my art. Everything else revolves around this blog as the hub.

The technological application emphasis in 2007 has frequently been on developing new applications which make communication more time-efficient. It's entirely possible that intense dialogue of the two line variety and notifications and alerts about what is going where might well be better suited to alternatives to blogging. I can well imagine that the 'painting a day' artists for example might well find an application which delivers the latest artwork to the mobile phone better than an e-mail subscription to a blog and a feedburner. I'm waiting to see what Duane comes up with!

Finding visual art blogs on the internet
It’s my belief that in 2007 we are becoming overwhelmed by the sheer number of ways people communicate about art online and the richness of the content which is out there.

What we desparately need is a way of accessing it more easily. I’m trying to do something in a very small, almost infinitesimal, way through the post I do each Sunday called “Who’s made a mark this week?” But much more needs to be done……..

Art and blogging art also doesn’t seem to be taken seriously by the geek community. Again and again the visual arts are ignored when categories for finding material are defined. Their preference is for film and photos (typically not related to ‘visual arts’) and these two formats dominate visual images on the net. As a result, the directory sites listing ‘art’ are frequently infiltrated by website owners whose sites really need to sit behind a filter!

Linking behaviour is one of the ways that artists can draw the attention of others to visual art images on the internet which are worth looking at or articles or blog posts which are worth reading or websites which are worth visiting. I’m a hard-boiled inveterate linker – I like sharing when I find something that is good and I like giving credit to people for things they’ve originated or found.

However linking activity and highlighting information through networks of sites is something that only seems to be understood within the web 2.0 world. Owners/Moderators of large web 1.0 forums are less enamoured with the idea of links being posted which may persuade people to travel out of and away from their site, especially when commercial considerations and advertising revenue is an issue. It’s enough to make me feel like I have to have two personas to communicate online. So in 2007, I ended up deciding to sit on the sidelines and observe web 1.0 communities and to make more time for participation in web 2.0 communities.

Advertising
The commercial aspects of marketing art is changing (who's spotted Damien Hirst Adsense adverts?) with trends within the marketplace as a whole switching to a focus online and, in particular, using data associated with social communication sites for targeting focused adverts. OFCOM states that ……
Advertisers in the UK spend more money per person on internet advertising than any other country, at £33. This is twice as much as France, Germany and Italy combined. At 14 per cent of total revenues, spend in the UK on online advertising overtook magazine advertising for the first time and was more than the total spend on outdoor, cinema, and radio advertising combined.
OFCOM
Small groups of artists have taken to advertising as a group in the major art journals. The major journals are now making sure that they can reproduce their paid advertising online (eg American Art Journal).

Some bloggers now monetise their art blogs with Google AdSense adverts (and/or others) and some (I think) have paid by link icons and blog posts. I'm not averse to the latter so long as it's declared.

I value independence and am personally resisting adverts on my blogs and main website but recognise that it's an area to keep under review.

Internet communities
For me 2007 has been a year of projects, of development and of loose affiliations which have come and gone during the course of the year. I’ve taken to observing rather than participating in groups which largely comprise non-bloggers. For me blogging feels more like the real world, where the people I talk to are adults who are responsible for themselves and their actions and who don’t need ‘moderation’ by others beyond that deemed appropriate by the blog owner as 'host'.

During 2007, I began to have the notion that we maybe now need to develop a new conceptual model for how blogging could be used to provide a link between the looser web 2.0 affiliations of artists which exist on the internet in terms of eg. blogrolls, cyberchum groups, sketchcrawl communities et al and those communities of artists which exist back in the ‘real ‘world - such as artists and art groups based in a locality and national art societies.

In conclusion, my own feeling is that although many of us might now be members of a variety of community sites we still find a value in blogging about art and the discussion of art, artists, different approaches and the range of art resources available to us. I know I very much value the trips I can take in space and artistic development alongside my chums and others in the art blogging community.

Long may our blogs continue to offer independence and individuality in which to display our art and discuss our art interests!

How do you see the big picture for blogging about art in 2007 - and what do you think have been the big changes in 2007? Please leave a comment on any of the above and tell me what you think.

[This is a first draft of explaning how I see the big picture - and I've got to go and do the big food shop for Christmas(!) - so I'm going to take the unusual step of reviewing and maybe revising this post later if I feel an edit could make points made any clearer or if I notice I've left out anything important which makes it make more sense! Do let me know if anything doesn't make sense!

I'm also going to try and revise the chart according to my thoughts and comments received and will post a second version at the end of this post before 31st December. You may see early drafts of a revised version appearing sooner than that. Do check back to see what if anything changes!
]

Links:

Sunday, September 23, 2007

23rd September : Who's made a mark this week?


"The Pescheria" and other fine art drawings
at 86th SGFA Annual Open Exhibition (2007)
at the Menier Gallery, London SE1
copyright all images - the artists


Society of Feline Artists - 11th annual open exhibition
two views of the Llewellyn Alexander Gallery

copyright all images - the artists

This is my first post since Tuesday in what has been a very odd week with all the trials, tribulations and repurcussions of Northern Rock .

I wasn't well earlier this month and missed the Private Views of both the annual open exhibitions in central London that I currently have work in - SOFA at Llewellyn Alexander and SGFA at the Menier Gallery so I'm going to start with these as they both closed yesterday. I visited them on Friday and Saturday and you can see a sample of photos from the exhibitions above and in this blog post.

I have to say after all the trauma recently, it was a really nice feeling to find I'd sold work in both exhibitions!


Art exhibitions
"Pause" (sold)
coloured pencil on black HP
copyright Katherine Tyrrell
  • The SOFA exhibition has been another big success for feline artists and both Gayle Mason and I sold work. Gayle sold "Out of Sight" twice - read her blog post to find out how! The one I sold was "Pause" which is a drawing of my abyssinian cat Polly enjoying the sunlight - with ear cocked for sounds behind her as I walked up and found her there.
  • The SOFA exhibition sees the full gamut of images of cats - from big cats to pedigrees to mogs and 'comic' illustrations of cats. One the whole it seems as though images of the domestic cat sell rather better than those of big cats which I would imagine do rather better in the large wildlife shows. You can see more images from the exhibition on the SOFA blog - here and here.
Dahlias #1 (sold)
pen and ink on HP
copyright Katherine Tyrrell

  • The 86th SGFA annual exhibition had about 200 fine art drawings on show on two floors of the Menier Gallery. It's a lovely exhibition space created out of what used to be an old chocolate factory. It's across the road from the ever-popular gourmet food stalls of the foodie paradise which is Borough Market and seems to have had a very respectable stream of traffic. I'll be having some sketches from visits on my sketchbook blog as soon as I can get them blog-ready.
  • On the other wide of the world - I was greatly intrigued by the exhibition of the 'arty' palettes produced by different artists in an exhibition seen on Treicia Gibney's blog A Reason to Paint. The exhibition at St Luke Artist Colourmen (Melbourne Australia) of The Exquisite Palette is absolutely fascinating!
Art Blogs

I find most of the new blogs I post here in people's blogrolls. If I see a blog with a name I'm not familiar with and an extensive history of regular posting then I will also post it. Occasionally I make an exception - such as for people who are no strangers to the printed work who deserve to have their new blogs highlighted............

Two art blogs this week with something of an educational slant, one from a very experienced blogger - Charley Parker (Lines and Colors) - and the other from an artist, tutor and author new to blogging - Richard McKinley who's a signature member of the
The Pastel Society of America. Group Art Blogs
  • Canvas by Canvas is a collaborative group of 11 Texas artists who share a love of painting and have a unique friendship. They have and an art blog.......
  • .......but also have so much fun eating and painting together they decided they also needed a blog about painting and food. They're looking for other artists to link with their sites, recipes and food paintings.
Art Forums
Art Supplies
  • Art Materials Live is advertised as "The UK's biggest and liveliest art materials show". It's at the National Exhibition Centre (Hall 10) just outside Birmingham from 8th - 11th November. Given that the annual art materials event at the Business Design Centre is Islington was cancelled this year, I think it might also just lay claim to being the ONLY art materials fair in the UK!
    • The show - which is sponsored by 'The Artist' and 'Leisire Painter' Magazines includes workshops sponsored by Derwent and Winsor and Newton.
    • I haven't made any firm plans as yet but was wondering whether it might be worth trying to meet up with UK readers of this blog?
Websites and blogging

Two sites which have been running series of blog posts which are well worth reviewing
.......and finally

Many, many thanks to all those people who offered good wishes during my recent traumatic experience with the first run on a British bank in about 150 years! Last weekend I could neither sleep properly nor eat a thing, but the situation now seems to be sorting itself out and it looks like there may even be a complete revamp of the system for protecting depositers' money. I do know I wouldn't like to go through another long weekend like the last one!


Links: