Lynn Painter-Stainers Prize 2015 - paintings by prizewinners see my prizewinners post for details |
This year's exhibition has an additional feature at the entrance level to mark the 10th anniversary of this Prize. There's a mini-exhibit within the exhibition of paintings by all of the previous winners of the Prize.
Paintings by the winners of first 10 years of the Lynn Painter-Stainers Prize |
So - what did I think of the paintings selected and the exhibition as a whole?
Well, this is always one of my favourite exhibitions to visit because of its emphasis on draughtsmanship and representational art.
- It always offers a great range in styles and approaches to these two criteria for the work selected.
- It's an exhibition which includes drawings as well as paintings and the contrast between monochrome and colour is also very pleasing.
- Plus the standard of artwork included is high
- even if it inevitably has the odd work where you really do wonder what the judges were about!
The end wall in the gallery |
Chris Shaw Hughes carbon pencil drawing, I do have very definite reservations about people creating drawings from the photographs of others - and a ton of respect for people who do such drawings from visits to the places they are portraying. Artists who do copy other people's photographs would do well to read my post about what happened to Luc Tuymans recently - see Plagiarise at your peril - the Luc Tuymans case. Of course if it's your own photo, the issues around copyright infringement simply don't arise.
Just around the corner wwere these two paintings which deserved a feature spot. You can see much larger versions of these two paintings on John Cahill's website. He uses amazing control over colour and brushwork to produce these paintings which are essentially an exercise in pointillism
Sunlight on the morning frost Acrylic and gouache,93x100cm £4,600 and Pablo watching the doves Oil on paper,93x100cm £4,600 by John Cahill |
Christopher Green's drawings which are all done on separate pieces of paper which are then out together to create one large picture. I love the fact it took me ages to notice that the car in the foreground is missing part of its roof. The perils of drawing from life in a car park where cars come and go!
These artworks looked good together |
Paintings by (top row) Toby Ward, James Lloyd, Katie Sollohub (bottom row) Stephen Parkinson, Rachael Gibson and Alex Hanna |
Jane Gardiner and her teacakes below Ilaria Rosselli del Turcos's rather wonderful boxes |
For example, I liked the image top right (above) - however I'd have liked it an awful lot more if somebody had cleaned up the image and removed all the dirty fingermarks. They might be contemporaneous but IMO they're not clever. It's perfectly possible to clean up an image without removing the spontaneity in other areas. The thing is I found my eye just kept being drawn by the dirty marks - and that's not supposed to happen.
Has anybody noticed how many nests have been drawn in the last year? I've nothing against them and admire those who have a go - but I do think it's time to move on to a new motif which represents a drawing challenge;
For those who don't know her - but like her work - on the right is Glaswegian artist Jane Gardiner whose Teacakes were on the small works wall underneath the rather lovely boxes painted by Ilaria Rosselli del Turco.
In my previous post I referenced the fact that one my ex-tutors won one of the runner-up prizes.
James Lloyd and his small white deer |
One final note. I didn't like the the catalogue this year for two reasons.
- colour reproduction seemed to be rather muted. Some of the pages looked 'greyed down' which was a big pity as the exhibition contained some paintings with exciting colour
- also I don't like seeing the pictures being listed in the alphabetical order of their artist's surnames. That's a purely administrative device and the image simply don't suit being listed in this way. It's really disappointing when you see a great large painting rendered very small in a catalogue. I'd like to see the exhibition go back to having a catalogue where the works are grouped in a way which produces a pleasing page. The organisers can always add on a number to the entry to indicate which page the image is published on.
Links to previous posts about the Lynn Painter Stainer Prize and Exhibition
2015
- Lynn Painter-Stainers 2015 - Prizewinners
- Lynn Painter-Stainer Prize 2015: Selected Artists & Events
- £15,000 Lynn Painter Stainers Prize 2015 - Call for Entries
- Review and video of the Lynn Painter-Stainers Prize Exhibition 2014
- Catherine Davison wins £15,000 Lynn Painter-Stainers Prize 2014
- £15,000 Lynn Painter-Stainer Prize 2014 - deadline approaches
- Lynn Painter Stainer Exhibition 2013: Review
- Lynn Painter Stainers Prize 2013 - Selected Artists
- Lynn Painter-Stainers Prize 2013: Call For Entries (13 Oct 2012) Overview of Call for Entries for the Lynn Painter-Stainers Prize 2013 for representational painting.
- Review: Lynn Painter-Stainers Prize 2012 Exhibition (01 Apr 2012) - review of the 2012 Lynn Painter-Stainers Prize Exhibition yesterday at the Mall Galleries
- Antony Williams wins Lynn Painter-Stainers Prize 2012
- Lynn Painter-Stainers Prize 2012 - Selected artists & artwork
- Lynn Painter-Stainers Prize 2012: Call For Entries
- Rachel Levitas wins Lynn Painter-Stainers Prize 2010 16 November 2010
- 65 Artists selected for Lynn Painter-Stainers Prize 2010 28th Oct 2010
- Lynn Painter-Stainers Prize 2010 - Call for Entries 03 Aug 2010
- Exhibition review: Toby Wiggins wins Lynn Painter-Stainers Prize17 Nov 2009
- Shortlist for Lynn Painter-Stainers Prize 2009 04 Nov 2009
- 82 works selected for Lynn Painter-Stainers Prize 16 Oct 2009
- Lynn Painter-Stainers Prize - selected artists 18 Sep 2008
- Lynn Painter-Stainers Prize 2008 and Exhibition 19 Nov 2008
Isn't dirty finger marks just an alternate way of signing the work? I think that they tell a meta-level story of the work - this was the artist who smudged the graphite with his/her fingers. It speaks of the creation of the work, but perhaps it can sometimes get a little too much
ReplyDeleteI do agree about drawings from photographs. The general public can be seduced by meticulous copying of photos, but I am surprised when judges of art competitions prefer them over a more spontaneous image done from life. I may sound a bit of a zealot about this, but my artistic new year's resolution is to do without reference photos this year.
ReplyDeleteYou'll have to trust me since I've seen it up close and you haven't. It does not like the normal smudging of graphite which everybody does.
ReplyDeleteIt just looks like dirty finger smudges in odd places of the type that often happens while working (e.g. at the edges) and which most people clean up.
Or to put it another way, they aren't adding anything to the image.