- my overall impression of the exhibition
- my commentary on my analysis of what I've noticed has changed in this year's exhibition - in terms of number of portraits, size and type, composition and colour and who are the subjects - with some number crunching for comparison with last year
Posting about the BP Portrait Award Exhibition this year was interrupted by the fire at the Glasgow School of Art - which was a huge distraction - so apologies for the delay.
For the record, I think this might be my favourite portrait - because it's extremely well designed and painted, shows a complete person - with hands - tells a story and has context of which more later....
![]() |
| The Oolographer (in his study) © JJ (Jeremy) Delvine |
Overall Impression
The main difference this year is that the exhibition is in a completely different gallery - The Porter Gallery - having been "bounced" by the exhibition about Michael Jackson which is located in its usual gallery.
In the video (below) I'm walking around a completely different space than in previous years. I'm not a fan of this gallery as I always find it claustrophobic. In effect it's a collection of small rooms and it's impossible to get any real distance from the portrait.
The overall effect for me was that it somehow doesn't feel like the BP Portrait Award exhibition. I'm guessing quite a few other people, particularly the portrait artists who visit, have had the same sensation.
![]() |
| This exhibition has lots of walls which prevent a view of the whole exhibition |
My first thought about the exhibition though is that it's a shame it been moved to the (wrong name) Galleries (ground floor on the right) - it all feels a bit more disjointed than it normally does.
...in terms of curation and display, this is the worst BP Exhibition I’ve seen in years. Such a diverse selection of paintings should not be crammed and hung so close to each other.Hence it felt very weird while walking around taking videos of this year's exhibition.
To me it felt a much less imposing exhibition compared to normal. It certainly lacked a "WOW" factor and colour for the most part - with the notable exception of Felicia Forte's painting!
Maybe unsurprisingly, this was also reflected in the reviews of the exhibition. I checked to see which newspapers and magazines had reviewed the exhibition and found much less than normal.
- The last reference to the BP Portrait Award by the Daily Telegraph was in 2017
- The Evening Standard - London's evening paper - has been a regular reviewer but this year hasn't done one. This year it just highlighted the winner of the award and had a very short piece about how a BP Portrait Award artist gifts painting to her ballet dancer subject
- Apollo Magazine stopped reviewing in 2015
- BBC: BP Portrait Award: Mum drinking tea picture wins top prize
- The Guardian | Surreal portrait of artist's mother wins 2018 BP portrait award
- Culture Whisper | BP Portrait Award 2018, National Portrait Gallery, London focuses on the winners and extracts from the press release
- The Upcoming - BP Portrait Award 2018 at the National Portrait Gallery - features images more than words and awarded the exhibition 3 stars "Overall, this show is worth a look for a few gems and some talented artistry, but it’s unlikely to set any sparks flying."
It left me wondering who all the people at the Press Review represented (other than foreign press) given the dire coverage of the exhibition online.
I guess my conclusion about the press reviews is that if you downgrade an exhibition in terms of the space used for its display, you shouldn't be too surprised if the press react accordingly.
However is the change in gallery the whole story?
Overall, while I liked some of the paintings a lot, I generally found it a less than inspiring exhibition. It lacks something. I can't work out whether this is because scanning the exhibition as a whole is much more difficult or whether the calibre of the work is somehow less.
Rather than blaming the actual portraiture, I keep coming back to how the discontinuity and "chunked" up nature of the exhibition just fails to create an exhibition which impresses. An impressive exhibition needs an exhibition space which measures up to it.
There again it might be because the NUMBER and TYPE of portraits this year are very different. Or the composition or colour
What's Different? An analysis of the Portraits
Every year I do an analysis of the portraits selected for the exhibition in terms of size and type - and you can see the results below. This year's exhibition prompted me to think about a wider-ranging analysis and to think about doing more analysis of the exhibits over time....
The factors I consider below are:
- number
- size and media
- type
- composition
- colour
- subject
























