Who painted this? #45 |
I delight more and more in the type of paintings which rarely get painted by contemporary artists - carefully constructed scenes recording everyday life.
There's an interesting story behind this painting. I wonder if you can find out what it is.
For those who've not risen to the challenge before please take a minute to read the rules - see below. The questions which need answering don't stop at "Who painted this?"
How to participate in "Who painted this? #45"
PLEASE make sure you read the rules before posting a comment - and ONLY POST ON THIS BLOG what you think is the answer.
Click this link to read THE RULES for participating in this challenge (this saves having to copy them out for each post!).
In short:
- use your brains not software to find the answer
- search using words only on a database of images
- leave your answer as a comment on this blog
- if correct it will not be published until the next post - which provides the answer
- if wrong it will be published
- do not leave the answer on Facebook!
- the winner - who gets a mention and a link on/from this blog - is the first person to give me a completely correct answer for ALL the things I want to know
Who Painted This #44 - The Answer
Chaucer at the court of Edward III by Ford Madox Brown Art Gallery of New South Wales - Ground Floor Screenshot - courtesy of Google Art Project |
- Title of the artwork: Chaucer at the court of Edward III
- Name of the artist who created this artwork: Ford Madox Brown
- Date it was created: from 1847 until 1851
- Media used: oil on canvas; Height: 3,910 mm (153.94 in). Width: 3,150 mm (124.02 in).
- Where it lives now: Art Gallery of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
Geoffrey Chaucer reading the "Legend of Custance" to Edward III and his court, at the palace of Sheen, on the anniversary of the Black Prince's forty-fifth birthdayFord Madox Ford was never officially a member of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood. but was sympathetic to their ambitions.
This is a large tableau rather than a painting pure and simple. For one thing there's nothing simple about it! It also took rather a long time to paint - starting in 1857 and finishing in 1851
It was painted on a white ground using what are described as pure colours. The lower portion of the painting has been cleaned.
The chap in grey who is pretending to be Chaucer in the painting is actually Dante Gabriel Rossetti. Other members of the Pre-Raphaelite group and associates appear as minor characters in the painting.
While the original is in Australia, a study for the work is owned by The Tate Gallery in London, exact in detail but much reduced in scale.
The Tate Gallery in London possesses a replica of the work, exact in detail but much reduced in scale.
Who guessed correct?
Who painted this #41? Congratulations to Jane Gardiner (Glasgow Painter) who was first with the name of the artist and all the other available details.
Others who got all the correct answers - or found the copy - were:
- Bernadette Madden
- Patrick Connors
- Barbara Jackson
- Angelique
- Caroline Alexander is going to kick herself when she realises how near and yet so far she was
- Fred Bennett - also caught out by the Tate study
- Colours and Textures - I loved the explanation of how she got there. Those hubbies come in handy!
Just for the record - anybody who leaves a comment on the page which lists all the "who painted this?" rather than the specific blog post is not counted. You have been warned!
Artist....Jan Steen
ReplyDeleteTitle....The Quack
Date....1650-1660
Medium..Oil on panel
Where it is ..Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam
How I found it... Looked up travelling dentist and came across a French site ( Histoire de l`Art Dentaire)..in English, with a lot of different Dentist paintings , one was by Jan Steen and looked to be by the same artist, looked at him on wikimedia commons and got all the information
Jan Steen
ReplyDeleteThe Quack (De Kwakzalver)
painted 1650-1660
oil on panel
Rijksmuseum Amsterdam
Googled 17C painting village pedlar (Having ruled out preachers and dentists) and went to Dutch Golden Age Paintings Wiki, Jan Steen looked like a possibility, under scenes of everyday life, Found image at Res oscura, info from commons.wikimedia
Mr C came up trumps on this one.
Hi Katherine,
ReplyDeleteThe 'who painted this? #45' is called De Kwak Zalver or The Quack or Charlatan on the Market. It's an oil on panel by Jan Steen created betweeen 1656-1660. Its dimensions are: 37.5 × 52 cm (14.8 × 20.5 in). It resides at the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam.
The painting was stolen from the Frans Hals museum in 2002 and recovered in 2008 by undercover agents.
I recognised it was a Dutch genre painting from the 17th C. and looked under Dutch paintings of quacks in google images.
Best wishes,
John
"The Quack"
ReplyDeleteJan Steen
oil on panel
1656-60
14.8X 20.5 "
Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam
Found by searching for Dutch genre painting.
Let's hope I didn't leave anything out this week!
Jan Steen 1626-1679 Dutch
ReplyDelete"Quack" also called "Charlatan on
the Market"
oil
Stolen from the from the Frans
Hals Museum, Haarlem Netherlands
in 2002
Recovered 2008 from a the house
of a businessman in Den Bosch
Netherlands
Knew it was Dutch first thought
one of the Bruegel's take on
debauchery, on second look
realized people were getting
medical treatment (so to speak).
Artist: Jan Steen [1626 -1679]
ReplyDeletePainting: The Quack,c. 1656-1660.
Medium: oil on panel.
Dimensions: 37.5 × 52 cm (14.8 × 20.5 in).
Location: Amsterdam, Rijksmuseum Amsterdam.
There is at least one other version of this. That version has a drapery behind the fellow relieved of his tooth.
Recognized the painting as Steen but was unfamiliar with it. A Google search with his name and "tooth extraction" gave me the correct name of the painting. With that another Google search brought me to Wikipainting.
I've got to start jumping on these Friday instead of Saturday or I end up late to the party.
ReplyDeleteI knew the artist right away, Pieter Bruegel the Elder or maybe the Younger, I wasn't sure at first. You have done recent posts on Bruegel on your Landscape blog and recently saw a feature on him on Muddy Colors blog.
I just can't find this particular painting!
Oh well I can't find it, I'm surprised since there is a lot of it on the web. Wish I had more time to look, now I'll have to wait to find out!
Looks like John Copely but I am not sure.
ReplyDelete