There's no analysis by CPSA of the entries beyond how many fall into which category of art (architecture, abstract, landscape etc) and how many of those are then successful at getting into the exhibition. This information is made available to members.
It is possible to draw conclusions from the slide exhibition. However, it needs to be remembered that:
- initial entry is done on the basis of slides only (ie how it looks on the slide is what matters for selection purposes)
- CPSA has no connection with the analysis which follows.
- a strong value pattern
- dramatic lighting
- very simple subjects
- very simple colour schemes (based on a limited range of colours)
- or a monochromatic emphasis (eg emphasis on one main colour or mono with one colour)
- very strong saturated colours
- a sense of humour
- demonstrated original concepts
- had an unusual titles which made you think
- 'too perfect' i.e. too much technique and too little concept (ie why would you want to look at it?)
- had poor composition and/or lacked a clear focal point
- appeared confused as an image on a slide - with too many items competing for attention
- lacked a good range of values
- lacked a good crop of the image
- were vignettes only
- an emphasis on monochromatic - but lacked a good range of values
- florals - which were not 'showstoppers'
- poor presentation in the slide medium (eg image far too dark)
- open optical mixing
- landscapes
Links: CPSA 14th international Exhibition 2006 - prize winners
Technorati tags: art , coloured pencils , colored pencils , drawing , painting , pencil , pencils
No comments:
Post a Comment
COMMENTS HAVE BEEN CLOSED AGAIN because of too much spam.
My blog posts are always posted to my Making A Mark Facebook Page and you can comment there if you wish.
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.