I was amazed at the number of articles this idea has generated and I'm guessing most of you won't have read them. Some are worth reading if you want to get an idea of the pros and cons for this idea which seems to revolve around when is a strike just a posture rather than an act with real impact.
I decided to line them up in terms of whether they are
- broadly supportive
- think the action is futile and/or there are better ways of making a stand
- just want to report the news and/or haven't made their minds up yet
 |
| The article most quoted by other articles! |
But first the facts...
- artists - including Richard Serra, Cindy Sherman and a lot of people I've never heard of
- art critics and educationalists - again the names mean nothing to me so I've no idea of their weight or otherwise.
 |
| The Art Strike Image |
The letter states
We, the undersigned artists and critics, lend our support to the call for an Art Strike on Friday, January 20, 2017, the day that Donald Trump will assume the presidency of the United States.This is the Facebook Page for the event. I have to say that it doesn't look very promising in terms of numbers who have said they will be involved so far (if you remember these people will be spread across the USA). Thew comments are worth a read!
The call reads:
#J20 Art Strike
- An Act of Noncompliance on Inauguration Day.
- No Work, No School, No Business.
- Museums. Galleries. Theaters. Concert Halls. Studios. Nonprofits. Art Schools.
- Close For The Day.
- Hit The Streets. Bring Your Friends. Fight Back.
These are the media articles about the letter and the proposed strike - divided into the different camps.
PRO - it will make a difference
- ArtNet News | Richard Serra, Cindy Sherman, and Dozens of Others Call for Action on Inauguration Day 'This call concerns more than the art field.' Written by one of the signatories
- Dazed | Cindy Sherman & Barbara Kruger go on strike against Trump - Over 80 artists and critics are encouraging the art world to stop work, school and business, on the day of Trump’s inauguration (specifically critical of Jonathan Jones)
- Hyperallergic | Should the Art World Strike on Inauguration Day? - Will the art world in the US close down on Inauguration Day? What will that mean? #J20. Good discussion of various perspectives on a strike but less balanced in the lack of consideration of alternative options
AGAINST - People are posturing and/or there are better ways of making a stand
- ArtNet News | Artists Criticize Proposed Strike for Inauguration Day - The divisive event has art world players debating how to effectively protest Trump. (This is the counterbalance to the first article listed above)
- The Guardian (Jonathan Jones) | has responded from across the pond with this article The 'art strike' against Trump is futile – cultural elites cannot effect change - Calling on cultural institutions to close on inauguration day only serves to make the likes of Cindy Sherman and Richard Serra feel good about themselves Very widely quoted by other articles. Maybe significant he's the only art critic who is not American who works for a liberal newspaper? I'm very much behind a lot of what he says - see below for an extract.
Yet an art strike is just about the least effective idea for resisting Trump that I have heard. The American left is in for a long, wretched period of irrelevance if this is its idea of striking back. I admire some of these artists greatly, but the notion that museums will help anything by closing their doors, or students will scare middle America into its senses by cutting art classes, tastes not of real hard-fought politics but shallow radical posturing by some very well-heeled and comfortable members of a cultural elite.
- CultureGrrl | “Staying Strong” to Get Over the Trump Hump: Whitney Director Adam Weinberg Makes His Stand Adam Weinberg went all Meryl Streep on us tonight.
Everyone knows there’s the J20 Art Strike and we’ve been asked what we are going to do. Are we going to be closed?…We are opening our doors as wide open as possible. We are not closing down. We’re actually going to do the opposite: We’re going make the museum free—pay what you wish—all day Friday, 10:30 a.m. to 10 p.m.
Being a child of the ‘60s, all I could think of was the teach-ins [the response on college campuses, including mine, to the controversial Vietnam War]. So we are going to have a series of discussion groups that will be going on all day long. It will be open for people to bring their own contributions to this, whether their readings, artworks, songs or performances.
This our territory. This is America. And we really need to express what we believe….I feel strongly about the Whitney’s role in that. It is our role not to let them own what we think of as America but to express what we believe is America….
INDEPENDENT - we just report the news
- a-n | US artists plan to strike on Trump’s inauguration day - comes across as more ambivalent than independent
- Apollo | Artists call for cultural strike in protest at Trump inauguration
- ArtBlouin | Artists and Critics Support Anti-Trump #J20 Art Strike - reads like a direct lift from a press release!
- Art Forum | Artists and Critics Plan Widespread Art Strike During Day of Trump’s Inauguration
- Forward | The Art World Responds To Trump’s Inauguration With A Call For Strikes
- Huffington Post | Artists Call For Global Culture Strike On America’s Inauguration Day -
The J20 Art Strike asks museums, galleries, schools, non-profits, theaters and concert halls to refrain from conducting business as usual. Fairly balanced with a hint of a slight lean towards those favouring strike action - New York Times | Artists and Critics Call for Culture ‘Strike’ on Inauguration Day - a balanced piece with a wider range of sources for comments than most
- The Art Newspaper reports on Strikes, closures and public gatherings: the art world gears up for Trump’s inauguration - More than 80 leading artists and critics have called for museums and galleries to close on 20 January - a more intelligent piece of comment.
What's also very interesting is the number of institutions and media outlets which have not taken a stand on this or written about it. I think it's presenting a number of them with a bit of a conundrum in terms of which way to lean!
....and what do I think?
My own take on it, for what it's worth, is that a strike only works when it represents a groundswell of opinion which has been grown over time.
A strike has to be big and it has to be solid to count for anything.
The danger of a strike organised by those who like taking stands on things they feel strongly about - without any existing connection to a wider community - is that it can become a damp squib. In which case it only serves to undermine the perspective of those taking part and emboldens those they may be protesting against.
That's why for my part I think
- there are more effective ways of making a stand
- the action taken by the Whitney Museum is far more effective in the long run.
In the U.S., the "art" community represents a significant portion of the active community at large. I, myself, am a member of the local County art league and such community leagues are prevalent throughout the nation in virtually every city and small town. Indeed, I am a "child" of the 60s (a Flower Child) and recall the huge impact artists were able to make at the time for Civil Rights and against the Vietnam Conflict of the times. While many of my friends have been on the fence, so to speak, Mr. Trump's recent tweet against Meryl Streep pretty much clinched the decision so that there is now a landslide of protests among artists of all varieties, both local and national, as well as a groundswell of support from international artists. Will it make a difference? The idea is to send a message, a very clear message, that a very, very large and growing proportion of the community has great reservations concerning the election of a big-mouthed unthinking Sociopath as a "leader" surrounding himself with America's own Mafia of crooks;that there is a growing unity among them. It also sends a clear message that there will be more to come. We plan to make his stay as miserable as possible until he is impeached or goes down in the wake of a World War.
ReplyDeleteI think this art movement is one to cut your nose to spite your face. If artists were smart they would realize that the Trumps are "ART Supporters". There may be a few artists that make a lot of money and think they are too good to miss a sale or two but think of the millions of artists that are out there doing their best to have their work seen and purchased. Think of all the businesses that SELL and SELL the marketing courses that drive the industry. Each artist should think independently. My work is not about politics. My work is from my heart and what I love. I do not need groups to tell me what to do on a political day in history. It is a shame to see how the art community is seeking out revenge of a sort. When I read the bios and the artist statements it is all about what I see, what I feel with my art not about what is happening in politics. It is a sad day and a sad adventure to spew this kind of hate.
ReplyDeleteMake your statement but not with art or artist's lives. I certainly do not want to be seen as part of a conspiracy. Your thinking is convoluted at best.
ReplyDeleteAdam Weinberg, Director Whitney Museum is beautiful people. His plan is the right direction for a positive art community.
ReplyDeleteI'm with the Whitney Museum. Artists are the creative thinkers and problem solvers. Let's get together and do our thing while not watching him on TV. Low ratings would be a good message to Trump. Throw open all the museums and art galleries and art schools and let's start creating our solutions.
ReplyDelete