Tuesday, November 08, 2016

Sketching the Vote in 2008

This is the sketch I drew while waiting for the results of the American election to be announced eight years ago (see my post Another kind of surge) 

Another kind of surge (November 2008)
(or what I did while waiting for the results)
11.5" x 8.5", pencil
copyright Katherine Tyrrell

The thing I remember that was so remarkable then were the huge long queues of people waiting to vote.

There were so many images of them in the press and online that I decided to start my very own queue and sat adding sketches images of individuals from the various images online until I'd created my very own queue led by an elderly African American lady with a flag.

It was also a bit of a reprise on a rather well known election poster of a few years back in this country. (I'm sure more than a few of you will remember that one!)

So who's sketching this US election? Will you be drawing?

Here's the list of people - with their posts that I found online last time and which I posted in
9th November 2008 - Who's made a mark this week?

I decided to make a compendium of all the illustrated blog posts that I could find by artists and illustrators blogging about the election day, the election process and the results....and here they are:
  • Other bloggers posted

  • and inevitably that message was reiterated yet again
  • and just for the record here's a link to what seems to have been a pretty powerful piece of performance art which went viral. The video for Yes We Can has now been viewed more than 50 million times across various video sites.
.....and just in case you wondered what they were doing while a lot of us watched the TV, here's Behind the scenes with the Obama family - watching the TV!

Sunday, November 06, 2016

The Silent Art Auction

The Silent Auction has become a feature of a number of exhibitions by art societies and other organisations.

The latest is the Royal Institute of Painters in Watercolour who are holding an exhibition between 8-13th November at the Mall Galleries - with a view to raising funds for their educational activities and to document its history in a book.

It will include a silent auction of a large number of small paintings by members - with bids starting at £50 and concluding with last bids on Saturday 12th at 2.30pm!

Below you can find:
  • what is a silent auction - an overview of what a silent auction is, 
  • how to make a silent art auction successful - MUST DOs for running a silent auction; and 
  • how to succeed with your big at a silent auction!


What is a silent auction?


The characteristics of a silent auction are as follows:
  • The auction is run without an auctioneer - meaning 
    • no fee payment to an auctioneer
    • no commission payable to a gallery 
    • no encouragement to bid at a specific time on a specific piece
  • A minimum bid price can be set. 
  • A specific increment for bid increases can also be stipulated
  • A specific time period is set during which bids can be received (typically linked to the length of time of the event)
  • A closing time for the auction is set
  • Specific bids are submitted on paper
  • An individual can rebid before the end of the auction (this happens more often when bidders can see other bids made)
  • At the end of the silent auction, the individual with the highest bid received on paper wins the auction for the item
  • The silent auction can be 
    • either the main attraction 
    • or an event additional to a normal exhibition

In terms of the bidding process it can be opaque or transparent or both!
  • Opaque: Bids on paper are placed in a receptacle which is not cleared until the auction ends. Bidders might be submitting bids which have already been beaten by existing bids - however they feel good because they tried.
  • Transparent: In "open-book bidding" the bids are written on a piece of paper next to the item. This means:
    • no bid is wasted as everybody knows that to secure the item they need to bid higher.
    • it encourages people to bid higher
  • Opacity within a transparent process: On open bids a bidder may use a number rather than a name when bidding. That way nobody knows who has placed the bid - only the value that has been bid.  Some people find this a more comfortable process. (This is very similar to the way bidding works on eBay auctions - which is now very familiar to many people).

How to make a silent art auction successful


This is a checklist of things an organisation needs to do to make a silent auction successful.

Thursday, November 03, 2016

2017 Wildlife Artist of the Year - Call for Entries

The Wildlife Artist of the Year has published its call for entries for the UK's most prestigious independent wildlife art competition - with a top prize of £10,000.

Entry is online or by post and the deadline for entries is February 20th 2017.

If you want to know what the exhibition looks like:

View of the exhibition in the Main Gallery at the Mall Galleries in June this year.

This is the 10th anniversary year for a competition that attracts entries from all over the world. It's been helping to raise both funds and awareness for endangered wildlife since 2008.  Since it began, the event has raised over £320,000 for conservation projects supported by David’s eponymous wildlife charity, protecting endangered wildlife across Africa and Asia.

The competition is organised by the conservation charity the David Shepherd Wildlife Foundation (DSWF). (UK registered charity no. 1106893) which works to protect endangered species in the wild.

The exhibition will provide a week of wildlife art - of some 150 exhibits - in all three galleries at the Mall Galleries.  You can also see original works from supporting artists and there will also be some special 10th anniversary events.

Prizes

The first prize is definitely worth winning and the category prizes are also very nice!

  • Overall Winner £10,000 cash prize & title ‘Wildlife Artist of the Year 2017’ 
  • Overall Runner-Up £1,000 cash prize. 
  • Remaining Category Winners £500 each.


Eligible Artists


The competition is open to both amateur and professional artists over the age of 17.

There is no residence requirement and entries are regularly sent from all over the world.


Eligible Art


The main conditions are:
  • You may enter up to 5 pieces of artwork at either £10 or £25 per entry.
  • All media are eligible (however photography is not eligible).  For example, the competition is very happy to receive artwork in media that includes oil, acrylic, watercolour, pencil, mixed media, bronze, plaster, wire, collage with styles encompassing traditional, abstract, monochrome, original prints* and many others .
* An original print is a print either in black or in colour, drawn from one or several plates, conceived and executed entirely by hand by the same artist, regardless of the technique employed, with the exclusion of any and all mechanical, digital or photomechanical processes. Every stage has been completed by hand by the artist. 
  • Entries must be completed by the entrant themselves
    • it must be their own original work. 
    • If a reference photo has been used, then the permission of the photographer is required (i.e. copyright issues are NOT allowed!)
  • Work completed before 15th February 2012 CANNOT be entered. 

How to enter


Full terms and conditions available on line at www.davidshepherd.org or by calling DSWF on 01483 272323.

The website provides three documents (as pdf files)

Categories


Entries must be submitted to a category. The categories are:
  • Animal Behaviour: Showing a real understanding of animal behaviour, a sense of character, maybe something the judges may not have seen before. 
  • Hidden World: A celebration of remote and rarely observed or lesser known landscapes and species. 
  • Into the Blue: Illustrate the wonderful world of water, be it ocean, seashore, wetland, river or stream. 
  • Urban Wildlife: Entries can be in an urban style or depict the city life of animals and plants. Judges will be looking for both originality in the habitat as well as the contrast between wild and urban life. 
  • Vanishing Fast: Our vanishing world – it can be any species officially listed as endangered or threatened on the IUCN Red List – or any landscape that is at risk. 
  • Wings, Feathered or Otherwise: The extraordinary variety of winged wildlife – birds and insects, in flight or at rest. 
  • Earth’s Beautiful Creatures: The choice is yours! 
For all categories the judges are looking for....

not only beautifully executed original artworks but also imaginative interpretation, moving away from the purely photographic to compositions with great characterisation, showing imagination, originality and genuine creativity. 

Method and cost of entry


Entries can be my post or online - however
  • all images submitted as an entry must be digital. Please NOTE that no allowance is made by the Judges for poor digital images or bad quality photographs. It's up to you to submit quality images.
  • all entries must reach the Foundation by 205h February.

Entry is online or via the post.  Your artwork should be submitted as a JPEG digital image via the digital entry form or should be burned to a CD. They recommend:

  • High resolution @300 dpi
  • minimum pixels of 2,200 pixels on the SMALLEST side
  • File size not exceeding 6MB.
  • all files must have an easily identifiable name eg you should use your surname followed by title of art artwork


Responsibilities of the artists
  • Note that delivery, collection, shipping costs and insurance are the responsibility of the artist.

What does it cost to enter


Entry costs vary depending on the status of the artist
  • normal entry fee: £25 
  • concessionary rate: £10 for DSWF members, 17-25 year olds and the over 60s.

How should I price my work?


  • All entries must be for sale.  Do NOT enter anything you don't want sold as this exhibition aims to sell - and that includes making your sale price appropriate for the exhibition and marketplace.
  • All prices need to be realistic i.e. priced for sale. Note that this competition is a bit different. Sale price will be negotiated with the artist but the final decision will be made by DSWF.  
  • That effectively means that if you enter your work and then put 
    • a silly high price on it so it won't sell, that DSWF can vary that so it will sell
    • a low price on it - maybe because you don't know London prices - that DSWF can raise it so that it's consistent with prices asked for other work of the same quality in the exhibition.

Commission

There are three commission rates:
  • Sales proceeds for works exhibited at the exhibition are to be split 50/50 for sales made for the duration of the exhibition and for one month after. 
  • After one month, any sales made as a result of the continued promotion of the piece by DSWF will be split 70% artist and 30% DSWF
  • Sale proceeds resulting from commissions taken at the exhibition are to be split 70% artist and 30% DSWF. 

More about Wildlife Artist of the Year in previous years



Wednesday, November 02, 2016

Characteristics of Paintings by Caravaggio

This is about the distinctive features and characteristics of paintings by the artist known as Caravaggio.

I went to a Breakfast Preview of Beyond Caravaggio at the National Gallery this morning and pondered while I was walking round how I was going to frame this post.

It suddenly struck me that since the exhibition was about his followers and imitators and interpreters that focusing on his characteristics might be a good idea.


The Characteristics of Paintings by Caravaggio


Hence this post is about the style and approach used by the Italian artist Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio (i.e. his name Michelangelo Merisi and he came from a small town called Caravaggio near Bergamo). He is known as Caravaggio.

Key Techniques employed by Caravaggio


These included:

NATURALISM

Ha was based in Rome at the beginning of the 17th century when it was a strong centre of Cathocism - but it also had a dark underbelly and underclass
  • he demonstrates intense naturalism - his people, fruit and flowers are very life-like
  • He is a keen observer of nature  
    • he paints from life - and uses models for his paintings
    • he initially specialised in painting fruit and flowers and is credited with producing the very first still life painting (see How to create a still life painting - and then review the bowl of fruit in "The Supper at Emmaus" below!)
  • he uses everyday subjects - ordinary people in sometimes extraordinary circumstances - but also pickpockets, swindlers, charlatans amd steet performers. 
"painting still life requires as much artistry as painting figures"
Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio
The Supper at Emmaus, 1601

Oil on canvas, 141 x 196.2 cm
The National Gallery, London | © The National Gallery, London
  • his figures are at least torsos, however...
  • he often uses three-quarter length figures; and...
  • occasionally figures are full length
  • his figures are often life-size
  • his hands are sometimes oversized

The curator contends that as a result his paintings appear very modern, it's easy to make a connection to the characters (you don't need to know any iconography to understand what's going on)

POWERFUL STORYTELLING

  • narrative paintings (not something we see a lot of these days!)
  • he demonstrates a capacity for very effective storytelling 
    • the storytelling has direct and emotional appeal
    • the stories transcend time
  • which is is underpinned by excellent composition and design. His compositions are:
    • often densely packed 
    • tightly cropped - just enough and no more
    • often employ dramatic tension e.g. subjects which very nearly touch - but not quite 
    • employ a shallow pictorial space
      • bulk and mass are tight againt the four lines which make the frame. 
      • backgrounds are very dark - and indeterminate in depth - which effectively makes them shallow
    • in summary they have a strong illusionistic power - they look real and it feels as if the figures are right next to us and might spill out of the picture frame
Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio
The Taking of Christ, 1602 

Oil on canvas, 133.5 x 169.5 cm 
On indefinite loan to the National Gallery of Ireland from the Jesuit Community, Leeson St., Dublin who acknowledge the kind generosity of the late Dr Marie Lea-Wilson 
Photo © The National Gallery of Ireland, Dublin

LIGHTING EFFECTS

His paintings frequently use evocative lighting through the use of
  • a strong directional light
  • employment of chiaruscuro - generating strong and prominent contrasts between light and dark
His paintings sometimes use muted lighting.

However he NEVER created a painting with a candle - no matter how many candle paintings were produced by his followers (all shown in one room with low lighting which makes the technical way candleight is shown all the more effective- even if it's nothing to do with Caravaggio!)

Caravaggio's Fans and Followers


Interestingly Caravaggio did not travel nor did he run workshops although his influence was widespread across a wide range of countries and artists.

Instead artists apparently:
  • flocked to Rome to see his work for themselves
  • or developed their own interpretations having seen his work elsewhere 
  • or tried new approaches after being told about the techniques and themes he employed.
One of the latter is Georges de la Tour - and the exhibition is worth going to if only to see his remarkable painting of The Cheat with the Ace of Clubs, c. late 1620s, Kimbell Art Museum, Fort Worth, Texas. This echoes Caravaggio's paintings of card sharps - although the people and clothing get a completely different treatment.

Georges de La Tour (1593-1652)
The Cheat with the Ace of Clubs (about 1630 - 34)

Oil on canvas 97.8 x 156.2 cm
Kimbell Art Museum, Fort Worth, Texas | © Kimbell Art Museum, Fort Worth, Texas

At the end of the day though, there is absolutely no doubt whatsoever who is the Master Artist in this exhibition. There may not be a lot of Caravaggio paintings in the exhibition - and most that are can be seen on a regular basis as part of the permanent collection - but they tower over all the other paintings in the show in terms of impact and presence.

Information about the exhibition


The exhibition is more about Caravaggio's influence and the painters of the the Caravaggesque style which peaked between 1612 and 1620 and had disappeared by c. 1650 - until Caravaggio's skills and talent and paintings were rediscovered in the early 20th century

It actually comprises 5 definite paintings by Caravaggio, one probable painting and 47 paintings by other artists.

The exhibition is in the basement of the Sainsbury Wing and continues until 15 January 2017. Adult tickets are £16 and you can find more information about tickets here


Other reviews

Tuesday, November 01, 2016

A Discussion about Museums in a Global Age

'Museums in a Global Age' is a LONG video organised by Art Review ostensibly about:

  • How do museums engage with and reflect the world they inhabit? 
  • What are their roles and responsibilities?

It's a very fast discussion about the purpose and future of museums in what's called "a global age". (Which prompts the thought have we ever not had "a global age"? It strikes me as a clumsy metaphor for a more precise concept relating to cultural communication).  They seem to mean in an age where "globalisation" is the norm i.e. money, people, ideas, whizzing around the world faster and faster.

There are all sorts of problems with this video.
  • the participants are sitting in semi-darkness in front of a projection which never changes. Absolutely ludicrous!
  • Nobody actually uses the projector for slides to expand on and exemplify points being made. So why is it there?
  • It seems as if there's a competition for who can say the most in the least time. Gabbling seems to be the order of the day - which is not wonderful when people are racing through lists of complex concepts in the absence of any powerpoint slides which provide a handle for engaging your brain cells and organising the rapid fire dialogue
  • I recommend some training in podcasting!
However it is worth listening to! I found it works better if you listen twice!




This discussion took place last month on 17th October - just before the Frieze Art Fair - at the Wolfson Theatre, New Academic Building at the London School of Economics

Speakers

Left to right in the picture above, we have:

Richard Armstrong - the representative of "Institutions"

  • Director of the Solomon R Guggenheim Museum and Foundation since November 2008
  • Previously, The Henry J. Heinz II Director of Carnegie Museum of Art. He also served as Chief Curator and Curator of Contemporary Art. 
  • Curator at the Whitney Museum of American Art (1981 to 1992) where he organized four Biennials, as well as several other exhibitions.
  • Works with senior staff to maximize all aspects of the Foundation’s operations: permanent collections, exhibition programs, acquisitions, documentation, scholarship, and conservation. 

Chair: JJ Charlesworth - an art critic, writer and commentator

  • Publisher of Art Review (a leading contemporary art magazine which maintains the Power 100 list) - having worked as a member of the Editorial Staff since 2006
  • Studied fine art at Goldsmiths College, London, in the mid-1990s before becoming a critic
  • Written reviews and commentaries on art, artists, culture and politics for many publications including ArtReview, Art Monthly, Flash Art, Modern Painters, Time Out London, the Daily Telegraph and online platforms art-agenda and ArtNet News. 
  • completed his PhD (a study of art criticism in Britain during the 1970s) in 2016
  • @jjcharlesworth

Adrian Ellis - a consultant who works for the Institutions and helps plan new ones

  • Founding Director of AEA Consulting, one of the world's leading arts, culture and entertainment consulting firms. 
  • His work spans the fields of cultural strategy, policy, and economics. 
  • Previously Executive Director of The Conran Foundation in London, where he planned and managed the creation of the Design Museum.
  • Former LSE student.
Comments on political and moral dilemmas relating to:
  • the scale of phenomenal investment in capital infrastructure in museum buildings by public and philanthropic resources 
  • why museums need to stimulate demand to consume that investment.
  • the commodification of cities around the world, the use of culture to differentiate a city - and how badly this is done
  • how many buildings get designed by how few architects
  • how many important factors relating to the development of museums are ignored until a relatively late stage
  • issues which occupy minds relate to how to balance the books not why a museum was built - because funding is often available for capital but not for revenue.
Speculates about what happens if globalisation goes into reverse - which is actually an issue I've begun to become more interested in as 'globalisation' becomes more and more identified with the ways in which it has had a destructive effect on economies and cultures.

Tiffany Jenkins - a writer who comments on museums as an academic, broadcaster and columnist

Interested in the politicisation of culture

  • how fine arts were seen as being a means for soothing the common man in the past - and what's different between then and now and the role of art in social inclusion
  • the dissipation of the hierarchy of art.
  • the unravelling of the canon of high art.

Did you know?


You can attend free public lectures and debates at the LSE with high profile speakers from academia, politics, business and civil society. Click the link for what's planned or follow Twitter's @LSEnews for the official feed.