After four weeks of daily episodes on weekdays, the new version of Watercolour Challenge on Channel 5 came to an end last Friday.
- I started off hopeful,
- was disappointed at the beginning by the technical cock-up, and
- then it started to irritate me as the series went on.
I decided to do a review, however I decided it might be wise to see if others were feeling in the same way.
So I asked this question on my Facebook - and received LOTS of very detailed responses! Extracts are provided below.
I'm writing a review of the Channel 5 Watercolour Challenge Series. What did you think of it?
* What did they do well?
* What could be improved?
The real Watercolour Challenge contest
Channel 5 (2022) versus Channel 4 (1998-2001)
- The positives of the programme reduced for me as the series went on.
- Aspects which I put down to just being "different" began to grate as the series progressed
- Many people commented that they didn't watch all the programmes despite having intended to do so.
Glad to have an art programme to watch, but felt it could have been so much better! (VG)
A poor copy of the original series, sadly. (SG)
5/10. Could do better! (PF)
Very disappointing, to put it mildly. (NS)
Too much repetition , out of sync editing , poor standard of judges except Peter, everyone gets a win. The good artists on here and there were a few had their efforts demeaned being beaten by someone with no ability whatsoever. (DP)
I used to love this show but for me the presenter was a major let down and some of the professional artists, lacked how can i put it "professionalism". I stopped watching. (KH)Despite numerous aspects that people felt were unsatisfactory, it was interesting to see it prompted people to get their paints out! I guess it was a case of "I can do better than that!"
Still enjoyed watching though - I was inspired to get my watercolours out after a few months of not using them.