- Watercolour: Elements of nature (Mellon Room) - finishes 27 September
- Ruskin's Turners (Shiba Gallery) - finishes 4 October (after last being exhibited 15 years ago!)
I highly recommend both exhibitions to anybody who enjoys watercolour paintings - particularly those of the past Masters - and who can get to Cambridge before they close.
Admission is free to both exhibitions.
Come to this exhibition to see what can be achieved with watercolour and how impressive the painters of the past were when they used it!
Shakespeare Cliff, Dover, c.1825, J.M.W. Turner (1775-1851), watercolour on paper, 181mm x 245mm Unsurprisingly, this is a painting which has been exhibited more than once! |
It's been a very real disappointment while writing this post to find that the Fitzwilliam website does not make it easy to share the watercolours in its collection online. One could be forgiven for thinking that there has been no will to digitise the collection (or maybe just a very poor database and/or search engine of what has been digitised?). The end result is that the paintings which are most difficult to exhibit are also the most difficult to find!
There should be no doubts that very many people appreciate watercolour paintings - this is an exhibition with a lot of visitors - however:
- There is no virtual exhibition of the exhibition or selected highlights for those unable to visit
- You have to know to search via their app - which can be found at http://webapps.fitzmuseum.cam.ac.uk/explorer/
- When you search the paintings in the collection, it's the oil paintings which typically come up for specific artists and not the watercolours. However if you search under drawings rather than paintings I then found that the watercolours begin to appear.
- Initial impressions were that important painters in watercolour appear to be completely ignored or are very difficult to find - until the advanced search function is used - or the special app.
My experience interrogating the website for links to paintings in the exhibition means I've endeavoured to share some of the links to works in the collection - and online - in my review below. Where it says "more watercolours by...." that means these are not necessarily in the show but are part of the collection.
Note also that the Museum is piloting a new approach to Photography in the Galleries and is allowing people to take photographs of paintings hung in the permanent collection - although sadly not those in the temporary exhibitions. Let's hope this new approach will also soon be reflected in better digitisation and access to the permanent collection and a more enlightened approach to the use of low resolution images of those artists whose work left copyright many moons ago.
Watercolour: Elements of Nature
The Fitzwilliam Museum has a very fine collection of watercolour paintings. This exhibition:
- demonstrates how the medium has been handled by different painters working in different traditions and in different countries.
- highlights the individual ways of working and
- where possible also comments on the paints and paper used by the artist.
Miniature Painting
This includes four works by Nicholas Hilliard. See Watercolour miniatures by Hilliard - typically on vellum stuck to a card (often a playing card)Flower Painting
This has four excellent examples of large watercolour paintings of flowers by Pierre-Joseph RedoutéLandscapes in Britain's "Golden Age"
This comments on how watercolours developed in the 18th and 19th centuries beyond the purely topographical. They became more interesting as artists began to be able to sketch and paint in the landscape due to changes in paint technology which made watercolour paints easier to use and transport.
Importantly this section highlighted some old favourites alongside other painters I'm less familiar with - such as Cornelius Varley and Peter de Wint and others.
The books of recipes for making small hard cakes of paint (introduced in 1781) and an early plein air painting box is on display.
The exhibition is notable for commenting on materials in relation to individual paintings in both the exhibition and catalogue. Would that more exhibitions did the same!
Included in the exhibition are manuals for "how to sketch" including A Treatise on Landscape Painting and Effects in Water Colours" by David Cox who was working art tutor for much of his professional career. (Note: You can read an archived copy online - I downloaded the pdf copy)
Here are links to their works in the permanent collection:
In terms of British watercolour painters, the only living artist represented is Barbara Rae with her painting of Red Hill. It's a pity there aren't more paintings by contemporary heavyweights.
Yorkshire fells, c.1812, Peter De Wint (1784-1849) watercolour with gum arabic over traces of graphite on paper, 363mm x 565mm De Wint was influenced by the work of Thomas Girtin He generally used a heavier weight paper by Thomas Creswick (c.1774-1840) or Whatman |
It includes landscape paintings by all the 'C's - Constable, Cotman, Cox, Cozens (A) and Cozens (JR) and a lot of paintings of water in the sea and the sky by Turner! (see above for examples); views of uplands by Girtin and visionary paintings by Palmer.
- Windermere by John Constable (1776-1837) - one of 70 watercolours by Constable during a 7 week tout of the Lake District in 1806. Plus more watercolour paintings by Constable
- Landscape with a dark hill and A Wood by Alexander Cozens (1717-86) - the original blot painter
- Mountain Scene and On the road to Tremadoc by David Cox (1783-1859). More watercolours by David Cox
- watercolour paintings by John Robert Cozens (1752-97)
- watercolour paintings by Samuel Palmer (1805-1881)
- watercolour paintings by Cotman (1782-1842)
- watercolour paintings by JMW Turner (1775-1851)
Postwick Grove, c.1835-1840, John Sell Cotman (1782-1842), watercolour on paper, 178mm x 272mm |
The Magic Apple Tree, c.1830, Samuel Palmer (1805-1881) pen and indian ink, watercolour, in places mixed with a gum-like medium, on paper, 349mm x 273mm This is one from his 'visionary' period when he was based in Shoreham in Kent. There's a long explanation about this famous painting on the website (link embedded in title)"in the more finished works, like the Magic Apple Tree, he invests nature with a visionary significance instead of attempting to represent landscape as such" |
Artists' materials
This focuses on the materials used to develop paints. Dry pigments - mostly derived from minerals, plants, natural earths and insects are on display along with the method of using mussel shells to mix them with a binder such as gum arabic.The books of recipes for making small hard cakes of paint (introduced in 1781) and an early plein air painting box is on display.
The exhibition is notable for commenting on materials in relation to individual paintings in both the exhibition and catalogue. Would that more exhibitions did the same!
Watercolour and the Amateur
The change in technology for producing paints and the growing popularity of landscape paintings in the 19th century prompted a boom in sketching.Included in the exhibition are manuals for "how to sketch" including A Treatise on Landscape Painting and Effects in Water Colours" by David Cox who was working art tutor for much of his professional career. (Note: You can read an archived copy online - I downloaded the pdf copy)
Watercolour Liberated
This part of the exhibition focuses on how painters reacted to the development of watercolour painting to include a high degree of finish during the course of the 19th century. Consequently it focuses on the more informal, sketchy and looser applications of watercolours by painters such as Cezanne and Pissaro; Singer Sargent and Whistler; and Steer and Nash- one of my favourites is Arthur Melville (1858–1904) who is a brilliant watercolourist and influenced the Glasgow Boys! I was really pleased to see a painting of The Alhambra at Granada but it's such a pity the image is not online - he's well outside the limitations of copyright. Interestingly its colour palette and the absence of blue skies makes it resemble a painting of Edinburgh Rock more than Granada!
Giudecca, ?1913, John Singer Sargent (1856-1925) watercolour over graphite on paper, 305mm x 457mm Sargent often painted his watercolours while sat in a gondola. This particular view is well away from the more popular sights in Venice and has been identified as the Rio delle Covertite on the Island of Giudecca There are two other rather nice paintings by Singer Sargent of a fountain and boats on Majorca - in the show |
Here are links to their works in the permanent collection:
- watercolour paintings by John Singer Sargent (1856-1925)
- watercolour paintings by James McNeil Whistler (1834-1903)
The two (dead) British painters most represented in the last section are
- Philip Wilson Steer (1860-1942) - watercolour paintings by Philip Wilson Steer (1860-1942). High Rock, Bridgnorth and Chalk-pits, Painswick are both in the show and impressed me with their simplicity
- Paul Nash (1889-1946). Sadly the watercolour paintings by Paul Nash (1889 - 1946) although interesting are not online - although they should be at some point next year after the 70th anniversary of his death.
Other reviews of this exhibition
Below are the reviews by:- Financial Times (Jackie Wullschlager) - Watercolours at the Fitzwilliam Museum
- The Spectator (Martin Gayford) - Whole worlds are conjured up in a few strokes: Watercolour at the Fitzwilliam Museum reviewed
- Country Life (Brilliana Harley) - Watercolour: Elements of Nature at the Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge
What a concise and excellent review Katherine!
ReplyDeleteI've seen both these shows three times, and each time I absorbed more and more understanding. These exhibitions, although small, are the absolute creme de la creme of watercolour painting. This is as good as it gets for the medium, and with curatorship of this quality one cannot help but be in awe of the wonderful tradition of watercolour painting that is our inheritance. How fortunate we are that work of this calibre is so acessible to us all. Absolutely marvellous.
Katherine, thank you for your comment regarding acrylic works in "watercolour" shows, I too find that it feels very un-authentic and takes away from the show as a whole. Where do we draw the line if acrylic works are hung that look just like oil? How about water-soluble oils, shouldn't they be accepted then too? It's not right, in my opinion. Anyway, thank you, and perhaps it is best not to publish this comment (lest it be taken as inflammatory, in which case I would regret it later). I mainly just wanted to say thanks. Beautiful review of these shows, which I wish I could see.
ReplyDeleteKathryn - I think it needs saying.
ReplyDeleteIn my (very strong) view artists using acrylic should create their own art society to display what can be achieved with acrylic paint - and stop blocking entries to art competitions and art society exhibitions by those using traditional watercolours.
We see far too little good watercolour painting these days. One only has to compare this exhibition to that of one well known art society to see how little traditional watercolour is valued these days.