The 112th Annual Exhibition of The Pastel Society has changed its name. Rather than being called "Pastels Today" - which has been its name for as long as I can remember it's now called Colour 2011.
I totally understand that this now gives the exhibition the benefit of a unique title for every exhibition but I'm left wondering what it says about the media of this media-based society. After all, this is a title which is hardly unique and could justifiably be claimed by the oil painters, the watercolourists, the painters in acrylic and the coloured pencil artists to name just a few.
Coupled with the change in name of the society (see end) - as now represented on the website and catalogue - I'm leaning very much towards the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" camp.
Mind you The Pastel Society website which badly needed updating has been improved so that's something. This now includes
- a much improved news page and
- a slideshow display of various works by members. However navigation is not easy and this can only be reached through quite a bit of scrolling down the exhibition page. In my view this really needs to be on a completely separate web page so no scrolling is required. After all the most important thing about the exhibition are the works - not who opened the exhibition!
Private View of The Pastel Society's Annual Exhibition - Colour 2011 - at the Mall Galleries |
Large works are back in the exhibition, however other than this I didn't note any other particular changes within the exhibition compared to previous years . My initial impressions were that there were fewer works and fewer non-members exhibiting however apparently there are only 12 fewer works than usual while there are much larger works included in the exhibition.
There are however quite a few non-members with just one work accepted. Only the serious applicants (Year 1) / candidates (Year 2) for admission had more. John Ivor Stewart, the President of the Pastel Society, assured me that the emphasis is always about quality and being a member is no guarantee of getting your work accepted. He'd like to see more work in future which isn't just about a subject which somebody has chosen to execute in pastel. He'd like to see more emphasis on the subject being the starting point for more exploration of the potential of pastel - taking risks with pastel marks.
Works I liked
I'm trying this year to pick out people I've not highlighted in reviews of Pastel Society Exhibitions in previous years - see the end of this post for links to those reviews.
I always do at least two tours of any exhibition. I've noticed a couple of things over the years about what pulls me back on the return visit. On the second visit I begin to get a feel for which works have stayed with me and I want to take a closer look at. By the same token flashy works which attracted my gaze first time around often fail to keep my interest later on. I also whizz past works I find boring on first glance on both tours - sorry! Can I just emphasise that failure to get a mention does not mean any artist or work falls into the latter category - however I am emphasising what it takes to get my interest! Over and above that there are always works which just don't quite do it for me.
North Gallery
Florence Triptych by Patrica Cain (a very large work priced at £14,000) - which unfortunately has a rather significant reflection of a window see the original here |
It's a very impressive triptych and nice to see somebody using formats which are not used so much these days. It's also good to see very large works back in the Pastel Society Exhibition - those by Mark Leach have been much missed. This is presumably in part due to the fact that large works can now be pre-submitted digitally to avoid undue expense of submitting them in person.
Patricia's works are altogether more structural and have more impact than those frequently seen by artists working in pastels. I expect her current exhibition in Scotland - Drawings (on) Riverside Exhibition at the Kelvingrove Museum & Art Gallery, Glasgow (15 April - 14 August 2011) will draw rave reviews judging by the works on her website.
I'm also most impressed by what appears to be a prodigious output bearing in mind how large these works are!
The size of the work also reminds me what people are missing when they create limits on the size of work which can be entered into art society exhibitions.
Works by Susan Dakakni PS |
I thought it was a pity his work was split between a large and impressive townscape in a burnt orange palette (see top photo) and works in a blue greys in the North Gallery.
Also in the North Gallery I liked the strongly graphic but also very subtle drawings of trees and pathways by Susan Dakakni PS - particularly the top work of the trio which has some very subtle colours.
She's obviously a lady who loves charcoal. I liked the fact that the colour wasn't "in your face" but was very subtle with just flashes of zingy colour. I felt they very much benefited from the light mount and way they'd been framed as this avoided the works from becoming over-dark.
Another artist working a large monochromatic work - this time in pencil - is Amanda Palmer who is a prize-winning artist and a Postgraduate of the Prince's Drawing School's Drawing Year. She has produced a standout piece - Noughts and Crosses - which was totally unexpected! One of those works where you find you keep returning to find new parts to the drawing. Her explanation for her work on her website is fascinating. I was really rather surprised it hadn't won a prize. Could it be because it was not a pastel work?
Noughts and Crosses by Amanda Palmer Pencil on Paper, 106 cm x 147cm 2010 |
There were a number of strong suites of work by Pastel Society members in the Main/West Gallery - which is where most of the members are hung. I do like the way members works get hung together in this exhibition. It has huge impact when they are all of a theme. Here are some examples.
I've always admire Victor Ambrus's style of drawing people and there's an excellent set of his pastel drawings on display in the exhibition. Apparently he draws on a good quality cream paper so that he can use white for highlights
Five drawings of people by Victor Ambrus ARCA RE PS |
Five still life works by Angela A'Court PS |
The Award Winners
I couldn't spot all the award winners on the walls and forgot to write and ask the very nice press lady for a copy of the winners - but I'll update this post when I have it. [Now updated - Roger Dellar won three awards so I've also added in a photo of his suite of works portraying chefs at work]
Chefs by Roger Dellar PS, RI, ROI - which unfortunately has a reflection on the work in the centre |
The award winners in 2011 are as follows:
- Arts Club Award - Roger Dellar RI, ROI, PS
- Buzzacott Award - Chris Clements (Non-member)
- Daler Rowney Art Materials Award - Roy Wright
- Frank Herring Easel Award - Sarah Bee PS
Works in Pastel by Sarah Bee PS (prizewinner is top right) |
- Anthony J. Lester Art Critic Award - Roger Dellar RI, ROI, PS
- John Longley Award - Maureen Davies ASWA (Non-member)
- Bill Patterson Memorial Award - Bob Last PS
Sun Shining through Maples by Maureen Davies ASWA |
Bob Last's set of four square pastels are in the centre of this shot His prizewinning pastel was bottom left of the four |
- John Purcell Paper Award - Brian Gallagher PS
- The Ranelagh Press Award - Rosa Roberts (Non-member)
- Brian Sinfield Gallery Fine Arts Award - Cheryl Culver RBA, PS (her website provides an excellent images of her work)
- Unison Pastels Prize - Roger Dellar RI, ROI, PS
- Schminke Pastels Prize - Eiko Yoshimoto PS
Landscapes by Cheryl Culver PS, RBA |
Demonstrations
As always there have been a well organised set of demonstrations. If you're able to get to London this next week then you can watch a demonstration of creating a pastel artwork on three of the days
- 26th April 2011: Roger Dellar will be demonstrating during the afternoon starting at 3.00pm.
- 27th April 2011: Roy Wright will be working on a 'Work in Progress' painting from 1pm to 5pm.
- 28th April 2011: Ann Wilkinson PS RBSA will be demonstrating from 11.30am to 3pm.
Exhibition Details
The exhibition is being held in the West and the North Galleries of the Mall Galleries on The Mall in London. It's open until Sunday 1st May 2011 between 10am to 5pm. However it closes at 3pm on final day.
I think the bunting around and about The Mall is for a little party which is taking place at Buck House down the other end of The Mall on 29th April - when the Gallery is closed for the day. (I jest not - I had to actually sit and think about why the gallery might be closed for all of five seconds!)
Previous exhibitions
These are links to previous exhibitions by The Pastel Society which have been reviewed on this blog:
- 2006: The Pastel Society - Annual Exhibition 2006
- 2007: "Pastels Today" - The Pastel Society Exhibition (#1) and "Pastels Today": The Pastel Society Exhibition (#2)
- 2008: The Pastel Society UK - 109th Annual Exhibition
- 2009: Exhibition review: The Pastel Society's 110th Annual Exhibition
- 2010: The Pastel Society - Annual Exhibition 2010
How to enter this exhibition
This is my post about how to enter this year's exhibition - How to enter the Pastel Society's 112th Annual Exhibition. The new information for 2012 when available will probably appear first on the Mall Galleries Call for Entries for the Pastel Society
This is the page you need to read if you are seeking election to membership - it takes two years.
and finally.....
For some reason I cannot fathom, The Pastel Society has decided to add UK after its name.
This is the only Pastel Society in the English-speaking world which has never had to explain the country it relates to. The only word that is important is "The" and that's because every other pastel society came after this one! It's also one of the reasons why international artists are so keen to apply for membership!
There's no problem having a strapline which indicates it is British or that it covers the United Kingdon - England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland - however from my perspective there is absolutely no reason to add in UK to the title. For me it diminishes rather than enhances the name of the art society.
Plus as members explained to me, the idea of the society being abbreviated to PSUK (try saying it and you'll see exactly what the problem is) does not fill them with glee! (that's a rhyming pun for anybody who hasn't got it yet!)
and I agree! Time for a rethink methinks! At any rate I'm going to go on referring to it as The Pastel Society and will not be adding the "UK"!
Links of interest to pastel artists:
I agree with your thoughts about changing the name for the exhibition. Pastel is a beautiful medium and deserves a share of the exclusivity given to watercolour and oil.
ReplyDeleteWOW Katherine! Thanks for taking the time to write such an detailed inclusive review of the exhibition. I really enjoyed it.
ReplyDelete